• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nordic journal of psychiatry. >Consensus guideline for therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry (2004): Bibliometric analysis of citations for the period 2004-2011
【24h】

Consensus guideline for therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry (2004): Bibliometric analysis of citations for the period 2004-2011

机译：精神病学治疗药物监测的共识性指南（2004年）：2004-2011年期间引文的文献计量分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the awareness of guidelines for the therapeutic monitoring (TDM) of neuropsychiatric drugs by the scientific community, a bibliometric analysis was carried out. Methods: Citations of a guideline for TDM of psychotropic drugs from the Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP-TDM) were compared with those of a guideline for TDM of antiepileptic drugs from the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE-TDM), published in Pharmacopsychiatry in 2004 and in Epilepsia in 2008, respectively. Citations for the period 2004-2011 were obtained from the Web of Science database (31 December 2012). The study included an analysis of the geographical distribution of the first authors and of the cited journals. Citing articles were classified according to five categories and 10 subcategories. Results: The AGNP-TDM and the ILAE-TDM were cited 214 and 67 times, respectively. For the AGNP-TDM, written by 14 authors from German speaking countries, the number of self-citations was 83 (39%). Most citations were found in the following categories: reviews in clinical pharmacology (85 times), clinical pharmacological studies in patients (49). Four out of the 74 different AGNP-TDM citing journals displayed 41% of the citations. The ILAE-TDM was published by five European authors and four authors from the USA. Europe (40) and North America (15) had the highest citation rates. For both guidelines, reviews in clinical pharmacology had the highest percentage of citations, 40% for the AGNP-TDM and 49% for the ILAE-TDM. Conclusion: The observations obtained in this pilot study allowed an analysis of the visibility of two expert guidelines by the scientific community.
机译：目的：为了评估科学界对神经精神科药物治疗监测（TDM）指南的认识，进行了文献计量分析。方法：比较了《神经精神药理学与精神医学杂志》（AGNP-TDM）中精神药物的TDM指南与国际抗癫痫联盟（ILAE-TDM）的抗癫痫药物TDM指南的引用。分别是2004年和2008年。从Web of Science数据库（2012年12月31日）中获得了2004-2011年期间的引文。该研究包括对第一作者和被引用期刊的地理分布的分析。引用文章分为五个类别和十个子类别。结果：AGNP-TDM和ILAE-TDM分别被引用214次和67次。对于由德国国家的14位作者撰写的AGNP-TDM，自我引用的数量为83（39％）。在以下类别中发现了大多数引用文献：临床药理学评论（85次），患者的临床药理学研究（49）。 74种不同的AGNP-TDM引用期刊中有4种显示了41％的引用。 ILAE-TDM由五位欧洲作者和四位美国作者发表。欧洲（40）和北美（15）的引用率最高。对于这两个指南，临床药理学的引用被引用的百分比最高，AGNP-TDM为40％，ILAE-TDM为49％。结论：在该试验研究中获得的观察结果允许科学界对两个专家指南的可见性进行分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号