...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing research >Psychometric testing of the social support survey on a Taiwanese sample.
【24h】

Psychometric testing of the social support survey on a Taiwanese sample.

机译：对台湾样本进行的社会支持调查的心理测验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SS) is a multidimensional, self-administered instrument used to assess various functional dimensions of social support. Less is known regarding its value for a Chinese population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the MOS-SS on an adult sample in Taiwan. METHODS: A total of 265 adult family caregivers of patients with cancer from four different hospitals in the north, middle, and south regions of Taiwan completed the MOS-SS. RESULTS: In the original five-factor model, unsatisfactory item discriminant validity was found in almost half of the items; the item-own subscale correlation was lower than the item-other subscale correlation. A two-factor model accounting for 68.98% of the variance was found using exploratory factor analysis. The first factor (emotional support) accounted for 62.28% of the total variance, whereas the second factor (tangible support) accounted for 6.7%; the interfactor correlation was .71. The two-factor model seemed to have satisfactory reliability and validity and better discrimination between different subscales than did the original five-factor model. DISCUSSION: Good reliability and validity were demonstrated in the MOS-SS when applied to an adult sample in Taiwan. A two-factor model, instead of a five-factor model as found in the Western countries, was found for this sample. Confirmation of the two-factor model and exploration of the two-factor model in related concepts are suggested for future studies.
机译：背景：医学成果研究社会支持调查（MOS-SS）是一种多维的自我管理的工具，用于评估社会支持的各个功能维度。对于中国人而言，其价值鲜为人知。目的：本研究的目的是评估台湾成人样本上的MOS-SS的心理测量特性。方法：来自台湾北部，中部和南部地区四家不同医院的265名成人癌症患者家庭护理人员完成了MOS-SS。结果：在最初的五因素模型中，在几乎一半的项目中发现了不令人满意的项目判别效度。项目自己的子量表的相关性低于项目其他子量表的相关性。使用探索性因素分析发现了一个占方差68.98％的两因素模型。第一个因素（情感支持）占总差异的62.28％，而第二个因素（有形支持）占6.7％;因子间相关系数为.71。与原始的五因素模型相比，两因素模型似乎具有令人满意的信度和效度，并且在不同子量表之间的区分度更高。讨论：MOS-SS应用于台湾成人样本时，具有良好的信度和效度。对于该样本，发现了两因素模型，而不是西方国家的五因素模型。建议对两因素模型进行确认并在相关概念中探索两因素模型，以供将来研究之用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号