...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing philosophy: an international journal for healthcare professionals >Why the cognitive science of religion cannot rescue 'spiritual care'
【24h】

Why the cognitive science of religion cannot rescue 'spiritual care'

机译：为什么宗教的认知科学无法挽救“精神保健”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Peter Kevern believes that the cognitive science of religion (CSR) provides a justification for the idea of spiritual care in the health services. In this paper, I suggest that he is mistaken on two counts. First, CSR does not entail the conclusions Kevern wants to draw. His treatment of it consists largely of nonsequiturs. I show this by presenting an account of CSR, and then explaining why Kevern's reasons for thinking it rescues 'spirituality' discourse do not work. Second, the debate about spirituality-in-health is about classification: what shall count as a 'spiritual need' and what shall count as 'spiritual care'. It is about the politics of meaning, an exercise in persuasive definition. The function of 'spirituality' talk in health care is to change the denotation of 'spiritual', and attach its indelibly religious connotations to as many health-related concepts and practices as possible. CSR, however plausible it may be as a theory of the origins and pervasiveness of religious belief, is irrelevant to this debate.
机译：彼得·凯文（Peter Kevern）认为，宗教认知科学（CSR）为医疗服务中的精神保健理念提供了依据。在本文中，我建议他有两个错误的认识。首先，企业社会责任并不意味着凯文想得出结论。他对它的治疗主要由非犹太人组成。我通过介绍CSR来说明这一点，然后解释为什么Kevern认为它拯救了“精神性”话语的原因不起作用。第二，关于健康中的灵性的争论是关于分类的：什么应被视为“精神需要”，什么应被视为“精神保健”。它与意义的政治有关，是一种具有说服力的定义。在医疗保健中，“精神性”对话的功能是改变“精神性”的表述，并将其不可磨灭的宗教含义附加到尽可能多的与健康相关的概念和实践上。企业社会责任，无论作为宗教信仰的起源和普遍性的理论，多么合理，都与这场辩论无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号