...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Legal and criminological psychology >Respect of dignity as an ethical principle in forensic psychiatry. Commentary on 'not just welfare over justice: Ethics in forensic consultation'
【24h】

Respect of dignity as an ethical principle in forensic psychiatry. Commentary on 'not just welfare over justice: Ethics in forensic consultation'

机译：尊重尊严是法医精神病学中的一项道德原则。关于“不仅仅是正义之上的福利：法医咨询中的伦理”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The conflicts between clinicians' duties to the courts and their duties to their patients represent a longstanding ethical dilemma for psychiatry and psychology. Candilis and Neal point to several circumstances in which these conflicts arise, including public safety. The authors also point to some of the guidelines and safeguards in place in the United States. In criminal cases, U.S. Supreme Court rulings outlawing 'deliberate indifference' to prisoner health (Estelle v. Gamble 429 U.S. 97, 1976), the doctrine of informed consent, the requirement that the police issue 'Miranda' warnings, and the requirement that defendants have access to counsel all help to ensure that the vulnerable are protected, whether or not the testimony of the forensic psychiatrist or psychologist advances their interests. Candilis and Neal point to the need for clinicians to balance their duties to justice, on the one hand, and welfare, on the other.
机译：临床医生对法院的职责与对患者的职责之间的矛盾，是精神病学和心理学领域长期以来的道德困境。 Candilis和Neal指出了发生这些冲突的几种情况，包括公共安全。作者还指出了美国已有的一些准则和保障措施。在刑事案件中，美国最高法院裁定对囚犯的健康“故意无视”（Estelle诉Gamble 429 US 97，1976），知情同意的学说，警察发出“米兰达”警告的要求以及被告的要求。无论法医精神病学家或心理学家的证言是否促进了他们的利益，均可获得律师的所有帮助，以确保弱势群体受到保护。 Candilis和Neal指出，临床医生需要一方面平衡正义与福利，另一方面平衡福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号