• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Nudging NIMBY: Do positive messages regarding the benefits of increased housing density influence resident stated housing development preferences?
【24h】

Nudging NIMBY: Do positive messages regarding the benefits of increased housing density influence resident stated housing development preferences?

机译：轻描淡写：关于增加住房密度的好处的正面信息是否会影响居民陈述的住房发展偏好？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Do positive messages regarding the benefits of increased housing density influence resident stated housing development preferences? We employ an experimental research design to test the efficacy of positive messages regarding increased housing density to reduce observed NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard). Using a survey-based experiment, we compared four messages: a notification of the public benefits; the private benefits; a social comparison drawing on expert knowledge of housing preferences; and a control stating recent trends in the municipality. Our sample of 202 residents of a mid-sized Canadian city indicates that messages regarding the public benefits of increased density reduced NIMBYism by four times the control message. We find some evidence in favor of the efficacy of the social comparison treatment as well. We discuss these findings with reference to the literature on smart city growth, and the policy implications that emerge. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：关于增加住房密度的好处的正面信息是否会影响居民陈述的住房发展偏好？我们采用一项实验研究设计来测试有关增加房屋密度以减少观察到的童年主义（不在后院）的正面信息的功效。通过基于调查的实验，我们比较了四种信息：公共利益通知;私人利益;根据专家对住房偏好的了解进行社会比较;以及说明市政当局近期趋势的控制措施。我们对一个加拿大中型城市的202名居民进行的抽样调查表明，关于密度增加带来的公共利益的信息使NIMBYism减少了控制信息的四倍。我们发现一些证据也支持社会比较治疗的有效性。我们将参考有关智慧城市增长的文献以及由此产生的政策含义来讨论这些发现。 （C）2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号