...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cellular immunology >Immunology's first priority dispute--an account of the 17th-century Rudbeck-Bartholin feud.
【24h】

Immunology's first priority dispute--an account of the 17th-century Rudbeck-Bartholin feud.

机译：免疫学的首要争议是17世纪Rudbeck-Bartholin争执的叙述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Modern immunology has been notably free of public disputes over credit for major discoveries in this discipline. But the early recognition of the lymphatic system witnessed two examples of heated priority feuds. The first in the 17th-century concerned the greater anatomical organization of the system, while the second in the 18th-century concerned its function. This essay reviews the earlier of the two disputes, in which a Swedish medical student (Ole Rudbeck) charged a respected Danish Professor (T. Bartholin) with plagiarism and antedating his observations. Thus ethical issues in immunology predate modern times. How this discipline reached this point in its history is another focus of this essay and also an excuse to review briefly the anatomy of the lymphatic system. The influence of nationalistic pride on priority disputes is also discussed.
机译：现代免疫学在该学科的重大发现方面显然没有公开的争议。但是，对淋巴系统的早期识别见证了两个激烈的优先权争执的例子。 17世纪的第一个涉及系统的更大的解剖学组织，而18世纪的第二个涉及系统的功能。本文回顾了这两个纠纷中的较早者，其中一名瑞典医科学生（Ole Rudbeck）指控一位著名的丹麦教授（T. Bartholin）gi窃并先于他的观察结果。因此，免疫学中的伦理学问题早于现代。该学科如何达到其历史的这一点是本文的另一个重点，也是简要回顾淋巴系统解剖学的借口。还讨论了民族主义自豪感对优先权争端的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号