...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Focal liver lesions: characterization with conventional spin-echo versus fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
【24h】

Focal liver lesions: characterization with conventional spin-echo versus fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.

机译:局灶性肝脏病变:常规自旋回波与快速自旋回波T2加权MR成像的特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare prospectively the diagnostic accuracy of T2-weighted conventional spin-echo (SE) and fast SE magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for differentiation of benign (hemangiomas or cysts) from malignant (metastases or hepatocellular carcinoma) liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with 55 confirmed liver lesions (20 hemangiomas, eight cysts, 22 metastases, four hepatocellular carcinomas, one malignant fibrous histiocytoma) underwent T2-weighted conventional SE (repetition time msec/echo time [TE] msec = 3,100/ 80,160) and fast SE (5,000-5,000/99-104 [effective TE]) MR imaging at 1.5 T. The images were evaluated quantitatively (lesion-liver signal intensity ratio and lesion T2 index [SIlesion TE80/SIlesion TE160, where SI = signal intensity] and qualitatively (blinded reading) by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Quantitatively, the T2 index (Az = .988) was more accurate than the signal intensity ratio at conventional SE (Az = .920) and fast SE (Az= .910) imaging (P < .05). Qualitatively, there was no statistically significant difference between the blinded reading of conventional SE (Az = .988) and fast SE (Az = .986) images in lesion characterization (benign vs malignant). There was a trend, however, toward superiority of conventional SE imaging for evaluation of "hypervascular" metastases (n = 9). CONCLUSION: With the specific parameters used, conventional SE and fast SE images provide equal accuracy for characterization of focal liver lesions. In patients with hypervascular metastases, double-echo conventional SE images may be preferable.
机译:目的:前瞻性地比较T2加权常规自旋回波(SE)和快速SE磁共振(MR)成像对良性(血管瘤或囊肿)与恶性(转移性或肝细胞癌)肝脏病变的区分。材料与方法:53例确诊的肝病患者(55例肝血管瘤,8个囊肿,22个转移灶,4例肝细胞癌,1例恶性纤维组织细胞瘤)接受了T2加权常规SE(重复时间msec /回声时间[TE] msec = 3,100 / 80,160)和1.5 T的快速SE(5,000-5,000 / 99-104 [有效TE])MR成像。对图像进行定量评估(病变-肝脏信号强度比和病变T2指数[SIlesion TE80 / SIlesion TE160,其中结果:从数量上看,T2指数(Az = .988)比常规SE(Az = .920)时的信号强度比更准确,且速度更快SE(Az = .910)成像(P <.05)。定性地,在病变特征描述中,常规SE(Az = .988)和快速SE(Az = .986)图像的盲读之间无统计学显着性差异(良性与恶性)。但是,对于评估“超血管”转移的常规SE成像的优势(n = 9)。结论:使用所使用的特定参数,常规SE和快速SE图像在表征局灶性肝病灶方面具有相同的准确性。在有血管转移的患者中,首选双回波常规SE图像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号