...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >A randomized phase II study of cisplatin/5-FU concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: Short-term infusion versus protracted infusion chemotherapy (KROSG0101/JROSG021).
【24h】

A randomized phase II study of cisplatin/5-FU concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: Short-term infusion versus protracted infusion chemotherapy (KROSG0101/JROSG021).

机译:食管癌顺铂/ 5-FU同步放化疗的II期随机研究:短期输注与长期输注化疗(KROSG0101 / JROSG021)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: A randomized phase II study was conducted to compare the toxicity and efficacy of combining short-term chemotherapy (CT) or protracted CT with radiotherapy (RT) for esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were <75 years and with performance status (PS) of 0-2, and had stages II-IVA esophageal cancer. Two cycles of cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) for 1 day and 5FU 700 mg/m(2) for 5 days (arm A) or cisplatin 7 mg/m(2) for 10 days and 5FU 250 mg/m(2) for 14 days (arm B) were given with RT of 60Gy/30 fractions/7 weeks (1-week split). RESULTS: Of 91 patients enrolled, 46 were randomized to arm A and 45 to arm B. Two cycles of CT were given concurrently with RT for 89% in arm A and for 71% in arm B with significant difference (P=.031). The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates for arm A were 46% and 35%, while those for arm B were 44% and 24%, respectively, without significant difference. The 2- and 5-year progression-free survival rates for arm A were 30% and 30%, while those for arm B were 29% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Protracted infusion CT with RT provides no advantage over standard short-term infusion CT with RT for esophageal cancer.
机译:目的:进行了一项随机的II期研究,以比较短期化疗(CT)或长期CT与放疗(RT)联合治疗食管癌的毒性和疗效。材料与方法:符合条件的患者<75岁,表现状态(PS)为0-2,患有II-IVA期食管癌。两个周期的顺铂70 mg / m(2)1天和5FU 700 mg / m(2)5天(A组)或顺铂7 mg / m(2)10天和5FU 250 mg / m(2) )连续14天(B组),RT为60Gy / 30分数/ 7周(1周分割)。结果:在入组的91例患者中,有46例被随机分配到A臂,45例被随机分配到B臂。A臂89%的患者和B臂71%的患者在放疗的同时行两个周期的CT检查(P = .031) 。 A组的2年和5年总生存率分别为46%和35%,而B组的分别为44%和24%,无显着差异。 A组的2年和5年无进展生存率分别为30%和30%,而B组的分别为29%和12%。结论:对于食管癌,采用RT进行长期输注CT优于采用RT进行标准短期输注CT的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号