• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Resources policy >Viewpoint/Whatever happened to security of supply? Minerals policy in the post-Cold War world
【24h】

Viewpoint/Whatever happened to security of supply? Minerals policy in the post-Cold War world

机译：观点/供应安全发生了什么？后冷战时代的矿产政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent years, there has been a widespread disengagement of government from the non-fuel mining industry and a progressive globalization of the markets for mineral-based products. Associated with these developments has gone a loss in the industrialized countries of the 'strategic' perception of minerals and of concern over their security of supply. For the most part this is to-be welcomed since direct government involvement In the industry frequently led to inefficiencies and distortions. However, it also carries risks. The milling industry has certain highly specific characteristics and the elaboration of good policy on minerals development continues to require the employment by government of those who understand these characteristics. Furthermore, an increased dependence on the global market needs to be matched by an increased awareness in government of the conditions governing world trade in mineral raw materials and the procurement policies of other countries.
机译：近年来，政府广泛脱离了非燃料采矿业，矿物基产品市场逐渐全球化。与这些发展相关的工业化国家已经丧失了对矿产的“战略”认识以及对矿产供应安全的担忧。在大多数情况下，这是受欢迎的，因为政府直接参与该行业通常会导致效率低下和扭曲。但是，它也带有风险。制粉工业具有某些高度特定的特征，制定详细的矿产开发政策仍然需要政府雇用了解这些特征的人。此外，需要增加对全球市场的依赖，与此同时，政府对矿物资源世界贸易条件和其他国家的采购政策的认识也应提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号