...
首页> 外文期刊>Library & Information Science Research >Author-team diversity and the impact of scientific publications: Evidence from physics research at a national science lab
【24h】

Author-team diversity and the impact of scientific publications: Evidence from physics research at a national science lab

机译:作者团队的多样性和科学出版物的影响:来自国家科学实验室的物理学研究证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the second half of the 20th century, scientific research in physics, chemistry, and engineering began to focus on the use of large government-funded laboratories. This shift toward so-called big science also brought about a concomitant change in scientific work itself, with a sustained trend toward the use of highly specialized scientific teams, elevating the role of team characteristics on scientific outputs. The actual impact of scientific knowledge is commonly measured by how often peer-reviewed publications are, in turn, cited by other researchers. Therefore, how characteristics such as author team seniority, affiliation diversity, and size affect the overall impact of team publications was examined. Citation information and author demographics were reviewed for 123 articles published in. Physical Review Letters from 2004 to 2006 and written by 476 scientists who used the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory's facilities. Correlation analysis indicated that author teams that were more multi-institutional and had homogeneous seniority tended to have more senior scientists. In addition, the analysis suggests that more mixed seniority author teams were likely to be less institutionally dispersed. Quantile regression was used to examine the relationships between author-team characteristics and publication impact. The analysis indicated that both. weighted average seniority and. average seniority had a negative relationship with the number of citations the publication received. Furthermore, the analysis also showed a positive relationship between first-author seniority and the number of citations, and a negative relationship between the number of authors and the number of citations.
机译:在20世纪下半叶,物理学,化学和工程学方面的科学研究开始集中在政府资助的大型实验室的使用上。向所谓的大科学的转变也带来了科学工作本身的变化,并持续出现使用高度专业化的科学团队的趋势,从而提高了团队特征在科学产出中的作用。科学知识的实际影响通常通过其他研究者引用同行评审出版物的频率来衡量。因此,研究了作者团队的资历,隶属关系的多样性和规模等特征如何影响团队出版物的整体影响。对2004年至2006年发表的123篇文章的引文信息和作者人口统计学进行了综述。《物理评论快讯》由使用国家高磁场实验室设施的476位科学家撰写。相关性分析表明,具有更多机构,资历相同的作者团队倾向于拥有更多的资深科学家。此外,分析表明,具有较高资历的作者团队在制度上的分散程度可能较小。分位数回归用于检验作者团队特征与出版物影响之间的关系。分析表明两者。加权平均资历和。平均资历与出版物收到的引用次数成负相关。此外,分析还显示第一作者的年资与被引次数之间呈正相关,而作者的数量与被引次数之间呈负相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号