• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Occupational and environmental medicine >The threat to scientific integrity in environmental and occupational medicine.
【24h】

The threat to scientific integrity in environmental and occupational medicine.

机译：环境和职业医学对科学完整性的威胁。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Over the last century, environmental and occupational medicine has played a significant role in the protection and improvement of public health. However, scientific integrity in this field has been increasingly threatened by pressure from some industries and governments. For example, it has been reported that the tobacco industry manipulated eminent scientists to legitimise their industrial positions, irresponsibly distorted risk and deliberately subverted scientific processes, and influenced many organisations in receipt of tobacco funding. Many environmental whistleblowers were sued and encountered numerous personal attacks. In some countries, scientific findings have been suppressed and distorted, and scientific advisory committees manipulated for political purposes by government agencies. How to respond to these threats is an important challenge for environmental and occupational medicine professionals and their societies. The authors recommend that professional organisations adopt a code of ethics that requires openness from public health professionals; that they not undertake research or use data where they do not have freedom to publish their results if these data have public health implications; that they disclose all possible conflicts; that the veracity of their research results should not be compromised; and that their research independence be protected through professional and legal support. The authors furthermore recommend that research funding for public health not be directly from the industry to the researcher. An independent, intermediate funding scheme should be established to ensure that there is no pressure to analyse data and publish results in bad faith. Such a funding system should also provide equal competition for funds and selection of the best proposals according to standard scientific criteria.
机译：在上个世纪，环境和职业医学在保护和改善公共健康方面发挥了重要作用。但是，该领域的科学完整性越来越受到某些行业和政府的压力的威胁。例如，据报道，烟草业操纵着名的科学家来使他们的工业地位合法化，以不负责任的方式扭曲了风险，并故意颠覆了科学过程，并影响了许多组织获得烟草资金。许多环境举报者被起诉，并遭到无数人身攻击。在一些国家，科学发现被压制和歪曲，政府机构出于政治目的操纵科学咨询委员会。如何应对这些威胁是环境和职业医学专业人员及其社会的一项重要挑战。作者建议专业组织采用道德规范，要求公共卫生专业人员保持开放;如果这些数据具有公共卫生影响，则他们在没有自由发表结果的地方不进行研究或使用数据;他们披露所有可能的冲突;他们的研究结果的准确性不应受到损害;并通过专业和法律支持保护他们的研究独立性。作者还建议，公共卫生的研究经费不应直接从行业中拨给研究人员。应该建立一个独立的，中间的资助计划，以确保没有压力去恶意分析数据和发表结果。这种供资系统还应提供平等的竞争资金，并根据标准科学标准选择最佳方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号