• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Occupational and environmental medicine >How valid is a short measure of effort-reward imbalance at work? A replication study from Sweden.
【24h】

How valid is a short measure of effort-reward imbalance at work? A replication study from Sweden.

机译：简短的工作量奖赏失衡状况如何有效？来自瑞典的复制研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVES: There is an urgent need for validated measures of health-adverse psychosocial work environments. We tested the validity of a newly developed short version of the original questionnaire measuring effort-reward imbalance at work (ERI). METHODS: The study sample comprised working men and women (n=4771) participating in the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH), a nationally representative longitudinal cohort study, in 2006 and 2008. Structural equation modelling was applied to test factorial validity, using the ERI scales. Furthermore, criterion validity was explored with two prospectively assessed health indicators, poor self-reported health and depressive symptoms. Results are based on logistic and linear regression analyses, with appropriate confounder control. RESULTS: The short version of the ERI questionnaire (16 items) provides satisfactory psychometric properties (internal consistency of scales, confirmatory factor analysis with a good model fit of the data with the theoretical structure). All scales, and the effort-reward ratio, were prospectively associated with an increased risk of poor general self-rated health and depressive symptoms, indicating satisfactory criterion validity. CONCLUSION: This short version of the ERI questionnaire provides a psychometrically useful tool for epidemiological studies focused on the health-adverse effects of work and employment in the context of a globalised economy.
机译：目标：迫切需要对不良健康的社会心理工作环境采取有效措施。我们测试了新开发的短版原始问卷的有效性，该问卷用于测量工作中的工作奖赏失衡（ERI）。方法：该研究样本包括2006年和2008年参与全国纵向代表性队列研究的瑞典纵向职业健康调查（SLOSH）的在职男性和女性（n = 4771）。结构方程模型用于检验因子有效性，使用ERI量表。此外，通过两个前瞻性评估的健康指标，自我报告的健康状况较差和抑郁症状来探讨标准有效性。结果基于逻辑和线性回归分析，并带有适当的混杂因素控制。结果：ERI问卷的简短版本（16个项目）提供了令人满意的心理计量学特性（量表的内部一致性，验证性因素分析以及具有理论结构的数据的良好模型拟合）。所有量表和努力回报率均与一般不良自我评估健康状况和抑郁症状的风险增加有关，表明标准的有效性令人满意。结论：ERI问卷的这个简短版本为流行病学研究提供了一个心理学上有用的工具，该工具专注于全球化经济背景下工作和就业对健康的不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号