首页> 外文期刊>Occupational and environmental medicine >A randomised controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of targeted occupational health and safety consultation or inspection in Ontario manufacturing workplaces
【24h】

A randomised controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of targeted occupational health and safety consultation or inspection in Ontario manufacturing workplaces

机译:一项随机对照研究,以评估安大略省制造业工作场所针对性职业健康和安全咨询或检查的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: From 2004 to 2008, the prevention system in Ontario, Canada ran the High Risk Firm Initiative, an injury-experience based targeted consultation or inspection programme. Our objective was to establish whether prevention system targeting of firms was effective in improving injury outcomes. Methods: Randomised controlled parallel groups. Population included all manufacturing firms registered with the Ontario Workplace Safety & Insurance Board in 2005. Firms ranked between the 2nd and 10th percentile on a composite measure of occupational health and safety performance were randomised to three study arms in 2006: targeted for Health & Safety Association (HSA) consultation, targeted for Ministry of Labour (MOL) inspection, or services as usual. Data included firm characteristics (sector, size, years in business, region, branches), work injury claims 2002-2008 and measures of consulting and inspecting activity. Negative binomial generalised estimating equations modelled claim and disability day rates by study arm and year, controlling for firm characteristics. Results: Among 2153 firms, firm characteristics and 2002-2005 rates of work injury claims and disability days were similar across arms. Firm outcomes were significantly different from year to year, but study arm by year interactions were insignificant indicating similar trends for all three study arms. 83% of HSA targeted firms were contacted and 63% engaged while 75% of MOL targeted firms were inspected with orders written in 56%. Conclusions: Consultation and enforcement programmes as implemented were not sufficient to reduce work injury outcomes over 21 month follow-up. Lack of benefit could be due to non-specific firm selection methods, limited firm participation in interventions, low intervention intensity or insensitivity of available outcomes.
机译:目标:从2004年到2008年,加拿大安大略省的预防系统实施了高风险公司计划,该计划是基于伤害经验的有针对性的咨询或检查计划。我们的目标是确定针对公司的预防系统是否有效改善伤害结果。方法:随机对照平行组。人口包括2005年在安大略省工作场所安全与保险委员会注册的所有制造公司。在2006年,按职业健康与安全绩效综合指标排名在第2至第10个百分点之间的公司被随机分配到三个研究部门:针对健康与安全协会(HSA)咨询,专门用于劳工部(MOL)的检查或照常提供服务。数据包括公司特征(行业,规模,业务年限,地区,分支机构),2002-2008年工伤索赔以及咨询和检查活动的度量。负二项式广义估计方程按研究部门和年份对索赔和残疾日率进行建模,以控制公司特征。结果:在2153家公司中,各部门的公司特征和2002-2005年工伤索赔和残疾天数的比率相似。每年的公司成果显着不同,但逐年研究之间的交互作用微不足道,表明所有三个研究部门的趋势相似。联系了83%的HSA目标公司,并聘用了63%的客户,同时检查了75%的MOL目标公司,并以56%的订单进行了检查。结论:实施的咨询和执行计划不足以减少21个月随访中的工伤结果。缺乏收益可能是由于非特定的公司选择方法,有限的公司参与干预措施,较低的干预强度或可获得结果的不敏感性所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号