Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants.

Grainger DW

首页> 外文期刊>Biomaterials >Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants.

【24h】

Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants.

机译：同行评审是专业责任：质量控制体系与参与者一样好。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The peer-review process remains a central part of the value and validity of scientific and technical publishing and proposal assessment. The peer review mechanism has many delicate components that should function most professionally and effectively for best results. An important central tenet is that all who seek to publish should freely avail themselves to review a commensurate load, considering many elements of professional conduct, ethics and responsibility in this process. The review itself should provide timely, unbiased, quality feedback to improve contributions to the system reviewers are serving. An additional component involves follow-on policing of published literature to assert its validity through consensus and validation. This short essay examines our collective duties as contributors, reviewers, and readers to the integrity and safekeeping of this essential quality control process.

机译：同行评审过程仍然是科学技术出版和提案评估的价值和有效性的核心部分。同行评审机制具有许多微妙的组成部分，它们应以最专业，最有效的方式运作，以取得最佳效果。一个重要的中心原则是，在此过程中，考虑到职业行为，道德规范和责任感的许多要素，所有寻求发布的人都应自由地利用自己的能力来审查相称的工作量。审查本身应提供及时，公正的质量反馈，以改善对系统审查者所服务的贡献。另一个组成部分涉及对已发表文献的后续治安，以通过共识和验证来断言其有效性。这篇简短的文章探讨了我们作为基本质量控制流程的完整性和安全性的贡献者，审稿人和读者的集体责任。

著录项

来源
《Biomaterials》 |2007年第34期|共5页
作者
Grainger DW;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类医用一般科学;
关键词
Review Publication Type; professional; responsibility; Quality Control; 质量控制;

机译：Review [Publication Type];professional;responsibility;Quality Control;质量控制;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants. [J] . Grainger DW Biomaterials . 2007,第34期

机译：同行评审是专业责任：质量控制体系与参与者一样好。
2. Peer Review in Education: Promoting Collaboration, Written Expression, Critical Thinking, and Professional Responsibility [J] . VINICIUS MEDINA KERN, LUCIANA MARTINS SARAIVA, ROBERTO CARLOS DOS SANTOS PACHECO Education and information technologies . 2003,第1期

机译：教育中的同行评审：促进协作，书面表达，批判性思维和职业责任感
3. Author Responsibilities in Improving the Quality of Peer Reviews: A Rejoinder to Iivari (2016) [J] . Jan Recker Communications of the Association for Information Systems . 2016,第1期

机译：提高同行评审质量的作者职责：对Iivari的反感（2016）
4. The impact of total quality management on the roles and responsibilities of information systems professionals [C] . Mary Sumner Proceedings of the 1993 conference on Computer personnel research . 1993

机译：全面质量管理对信息系统专业人员的作用和职责的影响
5. Effect of mattresses and pillow designs on promoting sleep quality, spinal alignment and pain reduction in adults: Systematic reviews of controlled trials. [D] . Fess, Philip. 2015

机译：床垫和枕头设计对提高成人睡眠质量，脊柱对齐和减轻疼痛的影响：对照试验的系统评价。
6. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature authored by medical professionals regarding US biomedicines role in responding to climate change [O] . Ross Graham, John Compton, Keith Meador 2019

机译：对医学专家撰写的有关美国生物医学在应对气候变化中的作用的同行评审文献的系统评价
7. Trends in the Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries Admitted to the Hospital With Unstable Angina 11This study was supported in part by the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation Hartford. Dr. Krumholz is a Paul Beeson Faculty Scholar. The analyses on which this publication is based were performed under Contract Number 500-96-P549, entitled “Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organization for the State of Connecticut,” sponsored by the Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The authors assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the ideas presented. This article is a direct result of the Health Care Quality Improvement Program initiated by the Health Care Financing Administration, which has encouraged identification of quality improvement projects derived from analysis of patterns of care, and therefore required no special funding on the part of this Contractor. Ideas and contributions to the authors concerning experience in engaging with the issues presented are welcomed. [O] . Krumholz Harlan M., Philbin Daniel M., Wang Yun, 1998

机译：不稳定型心绞痛住院的医疗保险受益人的护理质量趋势11该研究部分得到了帕特里克和凯瑟琳·韦尔顿·多纳休医疗研究基金会的支持。 Krumholz博士是Paul Beeson系的学者。本出版物所依据的分析是在合同号500-96-P549下进行的，该合同的名称为“康涅狄格州使用和质量控制同行评审组织”，由卫生与公共服务部卫生保健融资管理局赞助。本出版物的内容不一定反映卫生和公共服务部的观点或政策，提及商品名称，商业产品或组织也不一定表示得到美国政府的认可。作者对所提出想法的准确性和完整性承担全部责任。本文是卫生保健筹资管理局发起的“卫生保健质量改善计划”的直接结果，该计划鼓励确定通过对护理模式进行分析而得出的质量改善项目，因此该承包商不需要任何特殊资金。欢迎作者就涉及所提出问题的经验提出想法和贡献。
8. Peer Review, Basic Research, and Engineering: Defining a Role for QA (Quality Assurance) Professionals in Basic Research Environments. [R] . Bodnarczuk, M. 1989

机译：同行评审，基础研究和工程：为基础研究环境中的Qa（质量保证）专业人员定义角色。

Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅