• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Osiris >The Politics of Noncooperation: The Boycott of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics
【24h】

The Politics of Noncooperation: The Boycott of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics

机译：不合作的政治：国际理论物理中心的抵制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In 1974, the General Conference of UNESCO approved three resolutions condemning Israel. In retaliation, a group of physicists promoted a boycott of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), an institute created to foster collaboration in theoretical physics between industrialized and third world countries and partly supported by UNESCO. This political action against the "polilicizalion" of UNESCO was led by American and Israeli scientists. I show that the position toward the boycott was very different among European scientists. I shall argue that the boycott of the ICTP was motivated as much by the formal connection between UNESCO and ICTP as by the identification of the ICTP with the third world, which was blamed for the "exclusion" of Israel from UNESCO. The episode reflects the contradictions and workings of scientific noncooperation. It also reveals the limits of scientific internationalism in the second half of the twentieth century. In this context, I investigate the meaning ascribed by the actors to the term the "politicization of science."
机译：1974年，联合国教科文组织大会批准了谴责以色列的三项决议。为了报复，一群物理学家发起了对国际理论物理中心（ICTP）的抵制，该中心是为了促进工业化国家与第三世界国家之间的理论物理合作而创建的，并得到了教科文组织的部分支持。反对联合国教科文组织“政治化”的这一政治行动是由美国和以色列科学家领导的。我表明，抵制立场在欧洲科学家之间大相径庭。我将争辩说，抵制ICTP的动机既有教科文组织与ICTP之间的正式联系，也有与ICTP与第三世界的认同有关，后者被指责为以色列“排斥”教科文组织。这一集反映了科学不合作的矛盾和运作。它还揭示了二十世纪下半叶科学国际主义的局限性。在这种情况下，我研究了行为者赋予“科学的政治化”一词的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号