...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Organizational contradictions between safety and security - Perceived challenges and ways of integrating critical infrastructure protection in civil aviation
【24h】

Organizational contradictions between safety and security - Perceived challenges and ways of integrating critical infrastructure protection in civil aviation

机译：安全与保安之间的组织矛盾-在民用航空中整合关键基础设施保护的感知挑战和方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research article documents results from a survey conducted among employees in a regional Norwegian airline, highlighting challenges and disparities between the way flight safety and aviation security is organized in civil aviation. The results indicated that the introduction of new security regulations in Europe and Norway are changing communication and information sharing at airports. It is argued that these challenges are due to conflicting institutional demands and principle contradictions in the way safety and security are approached within the civil aviation system. This argument is based on descriptions of the organizational foundations for flight safety and characteristics of how aviation security is organized. A theoretical framework characterizing the differences in organizational principles between safety and security is presented, which may also be relevant for other critical infrastructures. The article also describes strategies for integrating critical infrastructure protection. In addition to discussing the survey results, concerns are raised about organizational contradictions between safety and security and the ability of aviation to manage the competing logics and contradictory organizational principles. Not integrating critical infrastructure protection is seen as a systemic vulnerability and, in the case of civil aviation, a concern for both flight safety and aviation security if not sufficiently moderated. The article proposes paying better attention to the organizational realities of aviation operations and performing critical evaluations of existing and new protective measures as possible solutions to the situation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：这篇研究文章记录了在一家挪威支线航空公司的员工中进行的一项调查的结果，强调了民航组织飞行安全和航空保安的方式之间的挑战和差距。结果表明，欧洲和挪威引入新的安全法规正在改变机场的通信和信息共享。有人认为，这些挑战是由于民航系统内的机构要求和原则上的矛盾造成的，这些体制要求和原则上存在矛盾。该论点基于对飞行安全的组织基础的描述以及航空安全组织方式的特征。提出了表征安全性和安全性之间组织原则差异的理论框架，该框架也可能与其他关键基础结构有关。本文还介绍了集成关键基础架构保护的策略。除了讨论调查结果外，人们还对安全与保安之间的组织矛盾以及航空管理竞争逻辑和矛盾的组织原则的能力提出了担忧。不整合关键基础设施保护被视为系统性漏洞，对于民用航空而言，如果不加以适当控制，则将对飞行安全和航空安全造成担忧。文章建议，应更加关注航空运营的组织现状，并对现有和新的保护措施进行严格的评估，以解决这种情况。 （C）2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号