...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Assessing Security Technology’s Impact: Old Tools for New Problems
【24h】

Assessing Security Technology’s Impact: Old Tools for New Problems

机译:评估安全技术的影响:解决新问题的旧工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The general idea developed in this paper from a sociological perspective is that some of the foundational categories on which the debate about privacy, security and technology rests are blurring. This process is a consequence of a blurring of physical and digital worlds. In order to define limits for legitimate use of intrusive digital technologies, one has to refer to binary distinctions such as private versus public, human versus technical, security versus insecurity to draw differences determining limits for the use of surveillance technologies. These distinctions developed in the physical world and are rooted in a cultural understanding of predigital culture. Attempts to capture the problems emerging with the implementation of security technologies using legal reasoning encounter a number of problems since law is by definition oriented backwards, adapting new developments to existing traditions, whereas the intrusion of new technologies in the physical world produces changes and creates fundamentally new problems.
机译:从社会学的角度来看,本文提出的总体思想是,关于隐私,安全性和技术的争论所基于的一些基础类别正在模糊。此过程是物理和数字世界模糊的结果。为了定义合法使用侵入性数字技术的限制,必须引用二进制区分,例如私有与公共,人与技术,安全与不安全之间的区别,以得出确定监视技术使用限制的差异。这些区别在物质世界中发展,并植根于对前数字文化的文化理解。试图捕捉使用法律推理实施安全技术时出现的问题会遇到许多问题,因为法律从定义上讲是后向的,使新的发展适应现有的传统,而新技术对物理世界的入侵则产生了变化并从根本上创造了新问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号