• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >The Just War Theory and the Ethical Governance of Research
【24h】

The Just War Theory and the Ethical Governance of Research

机译：正义战争理论与研究的伦理治理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article analyses current trends in and future expectations of nanotechnology and other key enabling technologies for security as well as dual use nanotechnology from the perspective of the ethical Just War Theory (JWT), interpreted as an instrument to increase the threshold for using armed force for solving conflicts. The aim is to investigate the relevance of the JWT to the ethical governance of research. The analysis gives rise to the following results. From the perspective of the JWT, military research should be evaluated with different criteria than research for civil or civil security applications. From a technological perspective, the boundaries between technologies for civil and military applications are fuzzy. Therefore the JWT offers theoretical grounds for making clear distinctions between research for military, civil security and other applications that are not obvious from a purely technological perspective. Different actors bear responsibility for development of the technology than for resorting to armed force for solving conflicts or for use of weapons and military technologies in combat. Different criteria should be used for moral judgment of decisions made by each type of actor in each context. In addition to evaluation of potential consequences of future use of the weapons or military technologies under development, the JWT also prescribes ethical evaluation of the inherent intent and other foreseeable consequences of the development itself of new military technologies.
机译：本文从道德正义战争理论（JWT）的角度分析了纳米技术以及其他用于安全以及双重用途纳米技术的纳米技术和其他关键使能技术的当前趋势和未来期望，该理论被解释为增加使用武装力量进行军事行动的门槛的一种手段。解决冲突。目的是调查JWT与研究的道德规范的相关性。分析得出以下结果。从JWT的角度来看，军事研究应该以不同于民用或民安应用研究的标准来评估。从技术角度看，民用和军事应用技术之间的界限是模糊的。因此，JWT为在军事，民防和其他应用研究之间做出明确区分提供了理论基础，而从纯粹的技术角度来看，这些区别并不明显。与开发解决冲突或在战斗中使用武器和军事技术时，不同的参与者对技术的发展负有责任。对于每种类型的参与者在每种情况下做出的决定，应该使用不同的标准来道德判断。除了评估未来使用正在开发的武器或军事技术的潜在后果外，JWT还规定对新军事技术发展本身的内在意图和其他可预见后果进行道德评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号