• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Comparison of China-US Engineering Ethics Educations in Sino-Western Philosophies of Technology
【24h】

Comparison of China-US Engineering Ethics Educations in Sino-Western Philosophies of Technology

机译：中西技术哲学中美工程伦理教育的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ethics education has become essential in modern engineering. Ethics education in engineering has been increasingly implemented worldwide. It can improve ethical behaviors in technology and engineering design under the guidance of the philosophy of technology. Hence, this study aims to compare China-US engineering ethics education in Sino-Western philosophies of technology by using literature studies, online surveys, observational researches, textual analyses, and comparative methods. In my original theoretical framework and model of input and output for education, six primary variables emerge in the pedagogy: disciplinary statuses, educational goals, instructional contents, didactic models, teaching methods, and edificatory effects. I focus on the similarities and differences of engineering ethics educations between China and the US in Chinese and Western philosophies of technology. In the field of engineering, the US tends toward applied ethics training, whereas China inclines toward practical moral education. The US is the leader, particularly in the amount of money invested and engineering results. China has quickened its pace, focusing specifically on engineering labor input and output. Engineering ethics is a multiplayer game effected at various levels among (a) lower level technicians and engineers, engineering associations, and stockholders; (b) middle ranking engineering ethics education, the ministry of education, the academy of engineering, and the philosophy of technology; and (c) top national and international technological policies. I propose that professional engineering ethics education can play many important roles in reforming engineering social responsibility by international cooperation in societies that are becoming increasingly reliant on engineered devices and systems. Significantly, my proposals contribute to improving engineering ethics education and better-solving engineering ethics issues, thereby maximizing engineering sustainability.
机译：道德教育已成为现代工程学中必不可少的。工程领域的道德教育已在全球范围内得到越来越多的实施。在技​​术哲学的指导下，它可以改善技术和工程设计中的道德行为。因此，本研究旨在通过文献研究，在线调查，观察研究，文本分析和比较方法，比较中美技术哲学中的中美工程伦理学教育。在我最初的教育投入和产出的理论框架和模型中，教育学中出现了六个主要变量：学科状态，教育目标，教学内容，教学模式，教学方法和教学效果。在中西方技术哲学中，我着眼于中美之间的工程伦理学教育的异同。在工程领域，美国倾向于应用道德培训，而中国则倾向于实践道德教育。美国是领先者，尤其是在投资金额和工程成果方面。中国加快了步伐，特别注重工程劳动力的投入和产出。工程伦理学是一种多人游戏，在（a）低级技术人员和工程师，工程协会和股东之间发挥不同作用; （b）中级工程伦理教育，教育部，工程学院和技术哲学; （c）国家和国际最高技术政策。我建议，在越来越依赖工程设备和系统的社会中，通过国际合作，专业工程伦理教育可以在改革工程社会责任方面发挥许多重要作用。重要的是，我的建议有助于改善工程伦理教育和更好地解决工程伦理问题，从而最大限度地提高工程可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号