...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Between same-sex marriages and the large hadron collider: Making sense of the Precautionary Principle
【24h】

Between same-sex marriages and the large hadron collider: Making sense of the Precautionary Principle

机译：在同性婚姻和强子对撞机之间：预防原则的理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Precautionary Principle is a guide to coping with scientific uncertainties in the assessment and management of risks. In recent years, it has moved to the forefront of debates in policy and applied ethics, becoming a key normative tool in policy discussions in such diverse areas as medical and scientific research, health and safety regulation, environmental regulation, product development, international trade, and even judicial review. The principle has attracted critics who claim that it is fundamentally incoherent, too vague to guide policy, and makes demands that are logically and scientifically impossible. In this paper we will answer these criticisms by formulating guidelines for its application that ensure its coherence as a useful normative guide in applied and policy ethics debates. We will also provide analyses of cases that demonstrate how our version of the principle functions in practice.
机译：预防原则是应对风险评估和管理中的科学不确定性的指南。近年来，它已成为政策和应用伦理学辩论的最前沿，已成为医疗和科学研究，健康与安全法规，环境法规，产品开发，国际贸易，甚至司法审查。这项原则引起了批评家的批评，他们声称该原则从根本上讲是不连贯的，过于模糊，无法指导政策，因此从逻辑和科学上讲都是不可能的。在本文中，我们将通过制定适用的指南来应对这些批评，以确保其连贯性，成为应用伦理和政策伦理辩论中有用的规范性指南。我们还将提供案例分析，以证明我们的原则版本在实践中如何起作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号