...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >A Note on the Definition of ‘‘Dual Use
【24h】

A Note on the Definition of ‘‘Dual Use

机译：关于“双重使用”定义的注释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While there has been much interest in this topic, no generally accepted definition of dual use has been forthcoming. As a contribution to this issue, it is maintained that three related kinds of things comprise the category of dual use: research, technologies and artefacts. In regard to all three kinds, difficulties are identified in making clear distinctions between those that are and are not dual use. It is suggested that our classification should take account of actual capacities and willingness to make use of these objects for ‘bad ends’ and not the mere possibility that this could be done, and here three ‘contextual factors’ are identified. A (provisional) definition is proposed that takes account of threats and risks.
机译：尽管对该主题引起了极大兴趣，但尚未出现公认的双重使用定义。作为对此问题的贡献，坚持认为三种相关的事物包括双重用途类别：研究，技术和人工制品。关于这三种，在区分那些是双重用途和非双重用途时，要明确区分困难。建议我们的分类应考虑到将这些对象用于“不良目的”的实际能力和意愿，而不是仅仅做到这一点的可能性，这里确定了三个“语境因素”。建议（临时）定义考虑到威胁和风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号