...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Participating Despite Questions: Toward a More Confident Participatory Technology Assessment: Commentary on: 'Questioning 'Participation': A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment'
【24h】

Participating Despite Questions: Toward a More Confident Participatory Technology Assessment: Commentary on: 'Questioning 'Participation': A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment'

机译：尽管存在问题，也要参与：走向更加自信的参与式技术评估：评论：“质疑'参与'：在佛兰德式参与式技术评估中对其概念化的批判性评估”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While the important challenges of public deliberations on emerging technologies are crucial to keep in mind, this paper argues that scholars and practitioners have reason to be more confident in their performance of participatory technology assessments (pTA). Drawing on evidence from the 2008 National Citizens' Technology Forum (NCTF) conducted by the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University, this paper describes how pTA offers a combination of intensive and extensive qualities that are unique among modes of engagement. In the NCTF, this combination led to significant learning and opinion changes, based on what can be characterized as a high-quality deliberation. The quality of the anticipatory knowledge required to address emerging technologies is always contested, but pTAs can be designed with outcomes in mind-especially when learning is understood as an outcome.
机译：尽管要牢记关于新兴技术的公开讨论的重要挑战，但本文认为，学者和实践者有理由对参与式技术评估（pTA）的表现更有信心。借鉴亚利桑那州立大学纳米技术社会研究中心举办的2008年全国公民技术论坛（NCTF）的证据，本文介绍了pTA如何提供集约化和广泛性的结合，这在参与模式中是独一无二的。在NCTF中，这种结合导致了重大的学习和见解改变，其基础是高质量的审议。解决新兴技术所需的预期知识的质量总是存在争议，但是pTA可以在设计时考虑到结果，尤其是在将学习理解为结果的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号