...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Changing the Paradigm for Engineering Ethics
【24h】

Changing the Paradigm for Engineering Ethics

机译：改变工程伦理范式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Modern philosophy recognizes two major ethical theories: deontology, which encourages adherence to rules and fulfillment of duties or obligations; and consequentialism, which evaluates morally significant actions strictly on the basis of their actual or anticipated outcomes. Both involve the systematic application of universal abstract principles, reflecting the culturally dominant paradigm of technical rationality. Professional societies promulgate codes of ethics with which engineers are expected to comply (deontology), while courts and the public generally assign liability to engineers primarily in accordance with the results of their work, whether intended or unintended (consequentialism). A third option, prominent in ancient philosophy, has reemerged recently: virtue ethics, which recognizes that sensitivity to context and practical judgment are indispensable in particular concrete situations, and therefore rightly focuses on the person who acts, rather than the action itself. Beneficial character traits-i.e., virtues-are identified within a specific social practice in light of the internal goods that are unique to it. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for implementing virtue ethics within engineering.
机译：现代哲学承认两种主要的伦理理论：道义论，鼓励遵守规则和履行职责或义务;后果主义，即严格根据其实际或预期结果评估具有道德意义的行为。两者都涉及普遍抽象原则的系统应用，反映了技术理性在文化上占主导地位的范式。专业协会发布了工程师应遵守的道德规范（道义论），而法院和公众通常主要根据工程师的工作结果（有意还是无意）（结果主义）将责任分配给工程师。在古代哲学中很重要的第三种选择最近又出现了：美德伦理学，它认识到在特定的具体情况下对上下文和实际判断的敏感是必不可少的，因此正确地关注行为者而不是行为本身。有益的性格特征，即美德，是根据特定的内部实践在其特定的社会实践中确定的。本文提出了一个在工程中实施美德伦理的综合框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号