...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Individual and Organizational Predictors of the Ethicality of Graduate Students' Responses to Research Integrity Issues
【24h】

Individual and Organizational Predictors of the Ethicality of Graduate Students' Responses to Research Integrity Issues

机译：研究生对研究完整性问题的反应的伦理道德性的个人和组织预测因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The development of effective means to enhance research integrity by universities requires baseline measures of individual, programmatic, and institutional factors known to contribute to ethical decision making and behavior. In the present study, master's thesis and Ph.D. students in the fields of biological, health and social sciences at a research extensive university completed a field appropriate measure of research ethical decision making and rated the seriousness of the research issue and importance for implementing the selection response. In addition they were asked to rate their perceptions of the institutional and departmental research climate and to complete a measure of utilitarian and formalistic predisposition. Female students were found to be more ethical in their decision making compared to male students. The research ethical decision measure was found to be related to participants' ethical predisposition and overall perception of organizational and departmental research climate; however, formalism was the only individual predictor to reach statistical significance and none of the individual subscales of the research climate measure were significantly correlated to ethicality. Participants' ratings of the seriousness of the issue were correlated with their ratings of the importance of carrying out their selected response but neither was significantly predictive of the ethicality of their responses. The implications of these findings for the development of more effective training programs and environments for graduate students in research ethics and integrity are discussed.
机译：要开发有效的手段来提高大学的研究完整性，就需要对已知有助于道德决策和行为的个人，计划和制度因素进行基准测量。在本研究中，硕士论文和博士学位。一所研究型大学的生物，健康和社会科学领域的学生完成了一项适合研究伦理决策的措施，并评估了研究问题的严重性和实施选择反应的重要性。此外，还要求他们对机构和部门研究环境的看法进行评分，并完成对功利主义和形式主义倾向的衡量。与男学生相比，发现女学生在决策中更具道德感。研究伦理决策措施被发现与参与者的伦理倾向以及对组织和部门研究氛围的整体认识有关;然而，形式主义是达到统计显着性的唯一个体预测因素，而且研究气候测度的各个子尺度都没有与道德显着相关。参与者对该问题的严重性的等级与他们对执行所选响应的重要性的等级相关，但都不能显着预测其响应的道德性。讨论了这些发现对研究生更有效的培训计划和环境的研究伦理和完整性的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号