...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen >Forest legislation in the recent jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court.
【24h】

Forest legislation in the recent jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court.

机译：联邦最高法院最近管辖权中的森林立法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

With the entry into force of the new Swiss Federal Law on Forests on the 1st of January 1993, the basis of decision-making for the Federal Supreme Court concerning forestry issues has, at least formally, fundamentally changed. This article depicts the development of the Federal Supreme Court's jurisdiction during 2000-2008 concerning the legislation on forests. The analysis of about 100 decisions reveals that the federal jurisdiction has, with regard to contents, barely changed in comparison to that of the federal law on supervision of the forest police of 1902. The most frequent causes of dispute are assessments of forest status, authorizations for deforestation, and forest distance regulations. The Federal Supreme Court merely refined the jurisdiction; it did not, or did not need to disclose fundamentally new lines [benchmarks]. It rather adheres to the restrictive definition of forest and the strict conservation of forests, while the cantons do not dispose of a large scope for the deforestation jurisdiction or the definition of the term "forest". The Federal Supreme Court grants the cantons more freedom to regulate and implement the forest distance. Obvious changes can be observed concerning the number of forest law cases that have been dealt with by the Federal Supreme Court. Compared to the 1980ies and early 1990ies, they have decreased by more than half. Among others, reasons for this decrease are the cantons' obligation to appoint courts only as last cantonal resort, the improvement of the formal and material coordination of the proceedings, and the introduction of the "static forest term" with respect to building zones in the sense of the federal law on area planning.
机译：随着新的《瑞士联邦森林法》于1993年1月1日生效，联邦最高法院关于林业问题的决策基础至少已从根本上发生了变化。本文描述了2000-2008年间联邦最高法院关于森林立法的管辖权的发展情况。对大约100项决定的分析表明，与1902年联邦森林警察监督法相比，联邦管辖权在内容上几乎没有变化。最常见的纠纷原因是对森林状况，授权的评估。砍伐森林和森林距离规定。联邦最高法院只是对管辖权进行了完善。它没有或根本不需要披露新的基准[基准]。而是坚持对森林的严格定义和对森林的严格保护，而各州并没有为森林砍伐管辖权或“森林”一词的定义分配较大的范围。联邦最高法院为各州提供了更多自由度，以调节和实施森林距离。在联邦最高法院处理的森林法案件数量方面，可以观察到明显的变化。与1980年代和1990年代初期相比，它们下降了一半以上。除其他外，造成这种减少的原因是各州有义务仅将法院指定为最后的州手段，改善诉讼程序的形式和物质协调，并在建筑中对建筑区采用“静态森林用语”。对联邦区域规划法的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号