...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Technology for the Built Environment >Validation of vertical ground heat exchanger design methodologies
【24h】

Validation of vertical ground heat exchanger design methodologies

机译:垂直地面热交换器设计方法论的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work presents a validation of two common methods for designing vertical ground heat exchangers. Both a simulation-based design tool and the ASHRAE handbook design equation are used to find design lengths for four different real systems, using actual experimental data, including building loads as well as physical parameters as inputs. The measured minimum and maximum ground heat exchanger exiting fluid temperatures were used as the design constraint. The simulation-based design tool predicted the borehole length to within 6% in all cases, while the ASHRAE handbook design equation yielded systems with errors from -21% to 167%. Most of this error can be explained by the way loads are represented in the ASHRAE handbook equation, with differences in the borehole thermal resistance also playing a smaller part. TheASHRAE handbook equation relies on a very simple load representation; although this allows it to be used as a simple hand calculation, it also precludes it achieving acceptable accuracy. It does not appear to be possible to revise the ASHRAE handbook equation so as to both significantly improve its accuracy and allow its use in a simple hand calculation.
机译:这项工作提出了两种设计垂直地面热交换器的常用方法的验证。基于仿真的设计工具和ASHRAE手册设计方程式均用于使用实际实验数据(包括建筑荷载以及物理参数作为输入)来查找四个不同实际系统的设计长度。将测得的最低和最高地面热交换器出口流体温度用作设计约束。基于仿真的设计工具在所有情况下均预测井眼长度在6%以内,而ASHRAE手册设计方程式得出的系统误差在-21%至167%之间。这种误差的大部分可以通过ASHRAE手册方程式中载荷的表示方式来解释,而井眼热阻的差异也较小。 ASHRAE手册等式依赖于非常简单的载荷表示。尽管这允许将其用作简单的手动计算,但也无法使其达到可接受的精度。似乎不可能修改ASHRAE手册方程式,以显着提高其准确性并允许其在简单的手工计算中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号