首页> 外文期刊>Seeing and perceiving >Maniatis's Arguments about Impossibilities and Rigging in Hammad et at (2008): the Importance of Pizlo (2008)
【24h】

Maniatis's Arguments about Impossibilities and Rigging in Hammad et at (2008): the Importance of Pizlo (2008)

机译:马尼亚蒂斯(Haniad et al。,2008)关于不可能和索具的争论:皮兹洛的重要性(2008)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lydia Maniatis (2009) adroitly argues our theories of a perspective illusion to do with angles are rigged in favour of our conclusions. Nice point: She develops useful alternative accounts of our illusion. However, her rigging argument involves the Bishop Berkeley induction problem. In response, we point out 2D features can specify 3D shapes. Counter to her induction problem, we argue specification requires a 3D environment of a particular, restricted kind, resulting in meaningful 2D features, as in the landmark Pizlo (2008) treatise.
机译:莉迪亚·马尼亚蒂斯(Lydia Maniatis,2009)巧妙地认为,我们对与角度有关的视错觉的理论被操纵以支持我们的结论。妙点:她为我们的错觉开发了有用的替代方法。但是,她的操纵论点涉及Bishop Berkeley的归纳问题。作为回应,我们指出2D要素可以指定3D形状。与她的归纳问题相反,我们认为规范需要特殊的,受限类型的3D环境,从而产生有意义的2D特征,如具有里程碑意义的Pizlo(2008)论文中所述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号