Systematic analysis of the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee practice guidelines

Feuerstein Joseph D.; Pelsis Jonathan R.; Lloyd Samuel; Cheifetz Adam S.; Stone Kevin R.

首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism >Systematic analysis of the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee practice guidelines

【24h】

Systematic analysis of the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee practice guidelines

机译：系统分析对髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎的科学证据和利益冲突的质量

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Objective: To determine the validity of the hip and knee osteoarthritis guidelines.

机译：目的：确定髋和膝骨关节炎指南的有效性。

著录项

来源
《Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism》 |2016年第4期|共7页
作者
Feuerstein Joseph D.; Pelsis Jonathan R.; Lloyd Samuel; Cheifetz Adam S.; Stone Kevin R.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类免疫性疾病;
关键词
Osteoarthritis; Guidelines; Quality; Conflicts of interest;

机译：骨关节炎;指南;质量;利益冲突;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Systematic analysis of the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee practice guidelines [J] . Feuerstein Joseph D., Pelsis Jonathan R., Lloyd Samuel, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism . 2016,第4期

机译：系统分析对髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎的科学证据和利益冲突的质量
2. Response to Feuerstein J et al. "Systematic Analysis and Critical Appraisal of the Quality of the Scientific Evidence and Conflicts of Interest in Practice Guidelines (2005-2013) for Barrett's Esophagus". doi:10.1007/s10620-016-4222-2 [J] . Bennett Cathy, Jankowski Janusz, Moayyedi Paul Digestive Diseases and Sciences . 2016,第11期

机译：对Feuerstein J等的回应。 “对巴雷特食管的科学证据和利益冲突实践准则（2005-2013年）的质量进行系统分析和批判性评估”。 doi：10.1007 / s10620-016-4222-2
3. Systematic analysis underlying the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in gastroenterology practice guidelines [J] . FeuersteinJ.D., GiffordA.E., AkbariM., The American Journal of Gastroenterology . 2013,第11期

机译：胃肠病学实践指南中科学证据质量和利益冲突的基础系统分析
4. Systematic Reviews as Evidence-Base for Dutch Guidelines to Assess Musculoskeletal Disorders as Occupational Disease: Examples of Shoulder, Knee and Low Back Disorders [C] . Henk F. van der Molen, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen, P. Paul F. M. Kuijer International Ergonomics Association, Congress . 2019

机译：系统审查作为荷兰语指南的证据基础，评估肌肉骨骼疾病作为职业病：肩部，膝关节和低患病症的例子
5. The efficacy of hip strengthening exercises compared to leg strengthening exercises on knee pain, function and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. [D] . Marsh, Andrew David. 2010

机译：与腿部强化锻炼相比，髋部强化锻炼在膝关节骨关节炎患者中在膝关节疼痛，功能和生活质量方面的功效。
6. Glucosamine and Chondroitin Sulfate: Is There Any Scientific Evidence for Their Effectiveness as Disease-Modifying Drugs in Knee Osteoarthritis Preclinical Studies?—A Systematic Review from 2000 to 2021 [O] . Silvia Fernández-Martín, Antonio González-Cantalapiedra, Fernando Muñoz, 2021

机译：硫酸甘氨酸和软骨素硫酸盐：是否有任何科学证据以膝关节骨关节炎的疾病改性药物的有效性临床前研究？-A从2000年到2021年的系统审查
7. Systematic review: the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in international inflammatory bowel disease practice guidelines [O] . J. D. Feuerstein, M. Akbari, A. E. Gifford, 2013

机译：系统评价：科学证据的质量和国际炎症性肠病疾病实践指南的利益冲突

Systematic analysis of the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee practice guidelines

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅