...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography >Another political ecology of civil society reflexiveness against urban industrial risks for environmental justice: The case of the Bisasar landfill, Durban, South Africa
【24h】

Another political ecology of civil society reflexiveness against urban industrial risks for environmental justice: The case of the Bisasar landfill, Durban, South Africa

机译：公民社会反抗城市工业风险以实现环境正义的另一种政治生态学：南非德班的Bisasar垃圾填埋场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The concerns of political ecology since its beginnings as a field have been predominantly set in ruralareas with limited focus on urban industrial risks. Further, debates on the global South (often fromAnglo-American perspectives) have not fully appreciated the divergent and differentiated perceptionsof urban risks and, therefore, everyday forms of resistance within civil society. Instead, workhas mainly focused on civil society power relations against the state and industry that are drivenby coherent populist political agendas. Against this setting, this paper’s contribution aims to bettercontextualize ‘other’ third world localities in political ecology through a case study of urbanindustrial risks in the upper/middle income (as opposed to rural, low/lower middle income)country, South Africa. In doing so, the paper sheds light on the derelict aspect of civil societycontestation, especially along class and ethnic lines, over urban landfill infrastructure as a livelihoodresource or a health hazard. The paper draws upon frameworks of self-reflexivity andreflexive localism as complementary to the mainstream political ecology to illuminate differentiatedcivil society reflexiveness and therefore, aims to advance the discussion of other politicalecologies. The case study of the largest formal landfill site in Africa, the Bisasar landfill situated inDurban, highlights differences underlying power relations and constraints within civil society (inleadership, social networking, resources and mistrust) that have implications for mainstreampolitical ecology notions of civil society coherence.
机译：自从作为一个领域开始以来，政治生态学的关注就主要集中在农村地区，而对城市工业风险的关注却很少。此外，关于全球南方的辩论（通常从英裔美国人的角度来看）还没有完全认识到对城市风险的不同和不同的看法，因此，也没有意识到公民社会内部的日常抵抗形式。取而代之的是，工作主要集中在由连贯的民粹主义政治议程驱动的民间社会对国家和产业的权力关系。在此背景下，本文的贡献旨在通过对南非中上等收入国家（而不是农村中低收入/中下收入国家）的城市工业风险进行案例研究，更好地将“其他”第三世界政治生态环境更好地理解。在此过程中，本文揭示了公民社会竞赛的遗弃之处，尤其是沿着阶级和种族的角度，将城市垃圾填埋场基础设施作为生计资源或健康危害。本文利用自我反身和反身地方主义的框架作为主流政治生态学的补充，以阐明不同的公民社会的反身主义，因此，旨在推进其他政治生态学的讨论。以非洲最大的正式垃圾填埋场为例，该垃圾填埋场位于德班（Durban），强调了公民社会内部权力关系和制约因素（领导，社交网络，资源和不信任）之间的差异，这些差异对公民社会一致性的主流政治生态学概念有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号