...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography >Navigating an inconvenient difference in antagonistic contexts: Doing fieldwork in Aceh, Indonesia
【24h】

Navigating an inconvenient difference in antagonistic contexts: Doing fieldwork in Aceh, Indonesia

机译：克服对立背景下的不便之处：在印度尼西亚亚齐进行实地考察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article discusses the challenges of doing fieldwork in an antagonistic context. Such an antagonistic context can emerge when a non-Muslim researcher conducts fieldwork in a Muslim country that experiences humanitarian intervention and reconstruction efforts after natural disasters or the end of conflict. This particular setting can create a conflation of Islamic and Western (liberal) values while a political settlement is about to be consolidated. The case discussed in this article is located in the province of Aceh in Indonesia, where a political settlement of a conflict which lasted more than 25 years converged with a massive influx of foreign aid for disaster mitigation vis-à-vis the desire to apply Islamic Law (shari'a). The combined effects of reconstruction efforts and political and armed conflict, forged a problematic co-presence of Western and non-Western values, which affected the relations between the (Western) researcher and (non-Western) researched by creating tension or even hostility between the two. The article argues that methodological dilemmas stemming from such a setting require a relational approach drawing on empathy, sameness and the personal, thereby taking into account emotions when conducting fieldwork. For this particular case I suggest an approach based on teamwork crossing cultures and gender among the research team members. To deal with constraints in such a setting, the article proposes to contextualize any potential difference between the researcher and researched, and to explore various relational elements drawing on psychoanalytical approaches and/or cross-cultural positioning through and in teamwork.
机译：本文讨论了在不利的背景下进行田野调查的挑战。当一个非穆斯林的研究人员在一个自然灾害或冲突结束后经历人道主义干预和重建努力的穆斯林国家进行田野调查时，就会出现这种对抗性的情况。在政治解决方案即将巩固之际，这种特殊的设置可以使伊斯兰和西方（自由）价值观融合在一起。本文讨论的案例位于印度尼西亚的亚齐省，该国历时25年之久的政治解决冲突融合了大量的外国援助以缓解灾害，这与寻求伊斯兰教的意愿有关。法律（伊斯兰教法）。重建努力与政治和武装冲突的综合影响，导致西方和非西方价值观共同存在一个问题，这通过在两者之间产生张力甚至敌意，影响了（西方）研究人员与（非西方）研究人员之间的关系。他们俩。文章认为，在这种情况下产生的方法论困境需要一种基于同理心，同一性和个人的关系方法，从而在进行实地调查时要考虑到情感。对于这种特殊情况，我建议一种基于研究团队成员之间跨文化和性别的团队合作的方法。为了解决这种情况下的局限性，本文建议将研究人员和被研究人员之间的任何潜在差异放在上下文中，并通过心理分析方法和/或跨文化定位以及通过团队合作来探索各种关系元素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号