• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sociology of health & illness >Reducing symbolic-violence in the research encounter: collaborating with a survivor of domestic abuse in a qualitative study in UK primary care
【24h】

Reducing symbolic-violence in the research encounter: collaborating with a survivor of domestic abuse in a qualitative study in UK primary care

机译：减少研究中的象征暴力：在英国初级保健的定性研究中与家庭虐待幸存者合作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper explores ideas of symbolic violence inherent in the research encounter (Bourdieu 1999). After defining symbolic violence and how the concept enters into domestic violence and abuse (DVA) research, we discuss the challenges arising from a (DVA) survivor taking on the role of interviewer in a qualitative study nested within a UK primary care based trial: IRIS (Identification and Referral to Improve Safety). KS, a survivor of DVA, conducted interviews with 12 women who had been referred to a domestic violence agency by primary care clinicians taking part in the IRIS trial in two UK cities (Bristol and east London) during 2009. Field notes were kept during all of the research meetings with KS and these were included in analysis. Our analysis maps the research pathway of 'non-violent communication' and discusses the role of social symmetry and proximity in the research encounter. We conclude that while a welcoming disposition, empathy and active listening are all generic skills to qualitative research; if a researcher can enter fieldwork with a claim of social proximity and symmetry, their use of these generic skills is enhanced through a process of shared objectification and empowerment talk. We explore the limitations of social proximity, its relationship to feminist and anthropological theories of 'insider' research and its relevance to primary care research.
机译：本文探讨了研究遭遇中固有的象征性暴力的观念（Bourdieu 1999）。在定义了象征性暴力行为以及该概念如何进入家庭暴力和虐待（DVA）研究之后，我们讨论了由（DVA）幸存者在基于英国初级保健的试验（IRIS）中进行的定性研究中扮演访调员的角色所带来的挑战（识别并转介以提高安全性）。 DVA的幸存者KS对2009年期间在英国两个城市（布里斯托尔和伦敦东部）参加IRIS试验的初级保健临床医生转介到家庭暴力机构的12名妇女进行了采访。与KS的研究会议，这些都包括在分析中。我们的分析描绘了“非暴力交流”的研究路径，并讨论了社会对称性和亲近性在研究遭遇中的作用。我们得出的结论是，尽管热情好客，同理心和积极倾听都是定性研究的通用技能。如果研究人员可以声称具有社会亲和力和对称性而可以参加野外工作，则可以通过共享的客观化和授权讨论来增强他们对这些通用技能的使用。我们探讨了社会亲缘关系的局限性，社会关系与“内部人”研究的女权主义和人类学理论的关系及其与初级保健研究的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号