...
首页> 外文期刊>Skeletal radiology >Short tau inversion recovery and three-point Dixon water-fat separation sequences in acute traumatic bone fractures at open 0.35 tesla MRI.
【24h】

Short tau inversion recovery and three-point Dixon water-fat separation sequences in acute traumatic bone fractures at open 0.35 tesla MRI.

机译:在开放0.35特斯拉MRI的急性创伤性骨折中的短tau反转恢复和三点Dixon水脂肪分离序列。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Fat suppression can be used to improve the diagnostic confidence in traumatic bone fractures of the extremities. We compared a three-point Dixon "sandwich" water-fat separation (WFS) sequence, resulting in a water-only and a fat-only image set after one excitation, with the STIR sequence on an open 0.35 T superconductive MR system.DESIGN AND PATIENTS: T1-weighted, STIR (2000/40 [TR/TE]), and WFS (2000/36 [TR/TE]) MR images were prospectively obtained in 27 patients with 40 radiologically diagnosed fractures immediately after first-line treatment. Signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratio, and bone marrow edema volumes were measured together with qualitative parameters (four-point scale).RESULTS: WFS was significantly superior to STIR in all quantitative parameters (better S/N ratio, P<0.001; better C/N ratio, P<0.001; larger marrow edema, P <0.023; Wilcoxon signed rank test). Visibility of bone marrow edema, visibility of fracture line, and preservation of anatomical details were better with the WFS sequence ( P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively; ANOVA). Fat saturation was rated more homogeneous, however, with the STIR sequence (not significant; P<0.101).CONCLUSION: On the basis of qualitative and quantitative assessments, the three-point Dixon "sandwich" water-fat separation sequence was consistently superior to the STIR sequence in the delineation of traumatic fractures.
机译:目的:抑制脂肪可以提高四肢创伤性骨折的诊断置信度。我们比较了三点狄克逊“三明治”水脂分离(WFS)序列,在一次激发后产生的只有水和只有脂肪的图像集与开放的0.35 T超导MR系统上的STIR序列相比较。和患者:一线治疗后,立即在27例经放射学诊断为骨折的27例患者中获得了T1加权,STIR(2000/40 [TR / TE])和WFS(2000/36 [TR / TE])MR图像。测量了信噪比(S / N),对比信噪比(C / N)和骨髓水肿体积以及定性参数(四点量表)。结果:WFS明显优于STIR在所有定量参数中(更好的信噪比,P <0.001;更好的信噪比,P <0.001;更大的骨髓水肿,P <0.023; Wilcoxon符号秩和检验)。使用WFS序列时,骨髓水肿的可见性,骨折线的可见性和保留的解剖结构更好(分别为P <0.001,P <0.001,P <0.001; ANOVA)。脂肪饱和度被评定为更均匀,但是具有STIR序列(不显着; P <0.101)。结论:在定性和定量评估的基础上,三点Dixon“三明治”水脂肪分离序列始终优于STIR序列用于描述外伤性骨折。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号