...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >The contours of U.S. climate non-policy
【24h】

The contours of U.S. climate non-policy

机译：美国气候非政策的轮廓

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Nearly a decade after the Rio summit and 3 years after the signing the Kyoto Protocol, the United States is without a climate policy. Contentious debate focuses on the costs and fairness of various policy options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The previous Federal Administration had proposed three primary market-based technology-centered climate policy approaches. Two of these (global emissions trading and electric utility deregulation) are untested in this context and are effectively stalled.The third (energy efficiency research and development) proposed to expand efforts that have met with mixed success in the past. After reviewing the current state of U.S. climate policy deliberations, this article considers these three approaches in detail. While none is realistic in its present form, each can serve as a basis for future climate policy development in a more congenial political climate, and with a broader range of policy options and interested actors involved.
机译：在里约热内卢峰会召开近十年后以及《京都议定书》签署三年之后，美国没有气候政策。引起争议的辩论集中在减少温室气体排放的各种政策选择的成本和公平性上。上一届联邦政府曾提出三种基于市场的，以技术为中心的主要气候政策方法。在这方面，其中两个（全球排放交易和电力管制放松）未经测试并有效地停顿了下来。第三个（能源效率研究与开发）提议扩大过去取得成功的努力。在回顾了美国气候政策审议的当前状态之后，本文将详细考虑这三种方法。尽管目前的形式都不现实，但它们都可以作为在更适度的政治环境中制定未来气候政策的基础，并具有广泛的政策选择和感兴趣的参与者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号