• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Whose elephants? Conserving, compensating, and competing in Northern Botswana.
【24h】

Whose elephants? Conserving, compensating, and competing in Northern Botswana.

机译：谁的大象？在博茨瓦纳北部进行保护，补偿和竞争。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While conservationists and politicians applaud the recent growth of Botswana's elephant population, farmers and residents of northern Botswana struggle to live with elephants who destroy crops and threaten livelihoods. The state's response has been to implement a narrowly applied compensation policy that reinforces government control over wildlife while communities affected by so-called human-elephant conflict demand increased rights to deal with the problem themselves. In this way, elephants represent contested ground between the state and local communities that can only be fully understood by considering the experiences and views of those who live with them as well as the national policy context in which management decisions are made. This article focuses on the hidden costs of attempting to live with elephants, framing this struggle as contestation over ownership of elephants in a political context that is increasingly focused on generating tourism revenues and expanding conservation territories.
机译：尽管环保主义者和政治家为博茨瓦纳大象数量的近期增长表示赞赏，但博茨瓦纳北部的农民和居民仍在努力与破坏大象并威胁生计的大象同住。该州的对策是实施狭义的补偿政策，以加强政府对野生动植物的控制，而受所谓的人类大象冲突影响的社区则要求增加自行解决问题的权利。通过这种方式，大象代表了州与地方社区之间的竞争地带，只有考虑到与他们生活在一起的人的经验和观点以及制定管理决策的国家政策背景，才能充分理解大象。本文着重于尝试与大象同住的隐性成本，将这种斗争形容为在政治背景下对大象所有权的争夺，而政治背景越来越侧重于创造旅游收入和扩大保护区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号