• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Empirical determination of political cultures as a basis for effective coordination of forest management systems
【24h】

Empirical determination of political cultures as a basis for effective coordination of forest management systems

机译：政治文化的经验性确定，是有效协调森林管理系统的基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To design viable strategies to implement sustainable forest management, tools are needed that allow the understanding and management of the driving forces behind conflicting opinions and divergent solutions. The approach of Thompson et al. (1990) tocultural theory--because of its descriptive power--may be an ideal basis to create such tools. The. possibility of determining empirically the cultural bias of the actors and groups involved is fundamental to this approach. We conducted a pilot study inthe eastern Amazon region to explore the possibility of characterizing individuals according to the four types of political culture defined by Thompson et al. The findings indicated that the empirical classification of individuals is possible hut complex. A relation between the types of political cultures and perceptions of sustainable forest management was observed. A systematic elaboration of adequate indicators and assessment methods is crucial in exploring the potential of transferring the theoretical approach into practice.
机译：为了设计可行的策略来实施可持续森林管理，需要使用工具来理解和管理意见分歧和解决方案背后的驱动力。汤普森等人的方法。 （1990）对文化理论的研究-由于它的描述力-可能是创造这种工具的理想基础。的。根据经验确定参与者和团体的文化偏见的可能性是这种方法的基础。我们在亚马逊东部地区进行了一项试点研究，以探索根据汤普森等人定义的四种政治文化来表征个人的可能性。研究结果表明，个人的经验分类可能是复杂的。观察到政治文化类型与可持续森林管理观念之间的关系。系统地制定适当的指标和评估方法，对于探索将理论方法付诸实践的潜力至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号