首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Can Watershed Management Unite Town and Country?
【24h】

Can Watershed Management Unite Town and Country?

机译:流域管理可以使城镇和乡村团结起来吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Resource agencies in the United States have taken up collaborative watershed management planning as a general policy tool. In doing so, they have adapted methods originally developed by voluntary partnerships in small rural watersheds and applied them across larger drainage areas with more diverse patterns of land use. Using Henri Lefebvre's concepts of social space, this article reviews research to identify the varied political, social, and physical characteristics that watershed organizers confront in urbanized and rural areas. Planners working in watersheds with diverse settlement patterns may find it difficult to meet the guiding principles suggested by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and National Research Council: organizing watershed partnerships to involve those most affected by management decisions, making decisions within a specific geographic area, and using science and data to guide decisions over time.
机译:美国的资源机构已经将流域协作管理计划作为一般政策工具。为此,他们采用了自愿合作伙伴关系最初在农村小流域开发的方法,并将其应用于土地使用方式更加多样化的较大流域。本文使用亨利·勒费弗尔(Henri Lefebvre)的社会空间概念,对研究进行了研究,以确定分水岭组织者在城市化和农村地区面临的各种政治,社会和自然特征。在具有不同居住模式的流域中工作的计划人员可能会发现难以满足美国环境保护署(US EPA)和国家研究委员会建议的指导原则:组织流域伙伴关系以使受管理决策影响最大的伙伴参与其中,并在特定范围内制定决策地理区域,并使用科学和数据指导随着时间的推移做出决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号