...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Biotechnology, Industrial Agriculture, and the Risk Society
【24h】

Biotechnology, Industrial Agriculture, and the Risk Society

机译：生物技术，工业农业和风险社会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article evaluates the risk/reflexive society perspective empirically by examining debates surrounding agricultural biotechnologies and the relationships between concepts associated with this perspective and support for agricultural biotechnology applications, using data from a regional U.S. Southwest telephone survey (n = 432). The perspective aided in conceptualizing debates surrounding agricultural biotechnology applications. Proponents of biotechnology tend to promote arguments consistent with the industrial paradigm, whereas critics tend to espouse risk/reflexivesociety arguments. The survey findings were more difficult to interpret. Trust and items about industrial agriculture were significantly related to support for both plant and animal biotechnology applications. Perceived knowledge was only significantly related to plant applications, while perceived control and how foods are produced were not significantly related to support. As the debates surrounding biotechnology remain controversial and the populace remains relatively unengaged, these results portray a public that represents a spectrum of views along an industrial/risk continuum.
机译：本文使用美国西南地区电话调查（n = 432）的数据，通过考察围绕农业生物技术的辩论以及与此观点相关的概念与对农业生物技术应用的支持之间的关系，从经验上评估了风险/反思性社会的观点。该观点有助于概念化围绕农业生物技术应用的辩论。支持生物技术的人倾向于提倡与工业范式相一致的论点，而批评家则倾向于拥护风险/反身社会论点。调查结果更难以解释。有关工业农业的信任和事项与对动植物生物技术应用的支持密切相关。知觉知识仅与植物应用显着相关，而知觉控制和食品生产方式与支持没有显着相关。由于围绕生物技术的辩论仍然存在争议，而民众仍然相对缺乏参与，这些结果描绘了一个公众，代表了工业/风险连续性领域的各种观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号