Using Public Preferences to Weight Species Prioritization Criteria in Conservation Decision Making: A Case Study to Explore Potential Strengths and Weaknesses

首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Using Public Preferences to Weight Species Prioritization Criteria in Conservation Decision Making: A Case Study to Explore Potential Strengths and Weaknesses

【24h】

Using Public Preferences to Weight Species Prioritization Criteria in Conservation Decision Making: A Case Study to Explore Potential Strengths and Weaknesses

机译：在保护决策中使用公共偏好权重物种优先次序标准：探索潜在优势和劣势的案例研究

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The conservation of biodiversity depends on the implementation of policy with limited financial resources. Due to this shortage of resources, conservation activities must be prioritized so that scarce funds are used rationally to prevent long-term biodiversity loss. To assure funding continuity, since it is the public that pays a significant part of conservation costs, it is imperative that managers and policymakers apply limited conservation funds in a way that makes people feel that their concerns about biodiversity loss are addressed. Here we argue for public preferences to be incorporated in species conservation decision making through criteria weighting. Public preferences were analyzed in two different contexts (abstract vs. concrete) to understand how stable public preferences are across different elicitation procedures. Our results show some resilience in criteria ranking, with functional importance being considered as the top criterion across different ways of questioning.

机译：保护生物多样性取决于财政资源有限的政策的执行情况。由于资源短缺，必须优先开展保护活动，以便合理地使用稀有资金来防止生物多样性的长期丧失。为了确保资金的连续性，既然是公众支付了很大一部分保护费用，那么管理人员和政策制定者就必须运用有限的保护资金，以使人们感到他们对生物多样性丧失的关注得到解决。在这里，我们主张通过标准权重将公共偏好纳入物种保护决策。在两种不同的情况下（抽象与具体）对公共偏好进行了分析，以了解不同偏好过程中公共偏好的稳定性。我们的结果表明，标准排名具有一定的弹性，功能重要性被视为各种质疑方式中的最高标准。

著录项

来源
《Society and Natural Resources》 |2016年第12期|共16页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类自然地理学;
关键词
Conservation priorities; criteria ranking; decision support; preferences' stability; species conservation;

机译：保护重点;标准等级;决策支持;偏好的稳定性;物种保护;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Using Public Preferences to Weight Species Prioritization Criteria in Conservation Decision Making: A Case Study to Explore Potential Strengths and Weaknesses [J] . Society and Natural Resources . 2016,第10a12期

机译：在保护决策中使用公共偏好权重物种优先次序标准：探索潜在优势和劣势的案例研究
2. Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi [J] . Suresh Jain, Preeti Aggarwal, Prashant Kumar, Transportation research . 2014,第MAY期

机译：使用多标准决策确定公共偏好，以评估城市通勤者从私人到公共交通的转变：德里的案例研究
3. Impacts of using relative weights in multiple criteria decision making: a comparative study between independent- and overlapping-criteria decision problems [J] . Panitas Sureeyatanapas, Supachai Pathumnakul International journal of applied decision sciences . 2017,第2期

机译：在多个标准决策中使用相对权重的影响：独立准则和重叠准则决策问题之间的比较研究
4. Using Surrogate Weights for Handling Preference Strength in Multi-criteria Decisions [C] . Mats Danielson, Love Ekenberg International conference on group decision and negotiation . 2015

机译：在多准则决策中使用代理权重处理偏好强度
5. A multi-criteria decision making for prioritizing potential alternatives truck management strategies. [D] . Yang, ChoonHeon. 2008

机译：优先考虑潜在替代卡车管理策略的多标准决策。
6. Research Domain Criteria: Strengths Weaknesses and Potential Alternatives for Future Psychiatric Research [O] . Christopher A. Ross, Russell L. Margolis 2019

机译：研究领域标准：未来精神病学研究的优势劣势和潜在替代方案
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考

Using Public Preferences to Weight Species Prioritization Criteria in Conservation Decision Making: A Case Study to Explore Potential Strengths and Weaknesses

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅