...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sportverletzung Sportschaden: Organ der Gesellschaft fu?r Orthopa?disch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin >Subjective function scores for the musculoskeletal system of uninjured high-level competitive pole vaulters in recreational, training and competition periods
【24h】

Subjective function scores for the musculoskeletal system of uninjured high-level competitive pole vaulters in recreational, training and competition periods

机译：休闲，训练和比赛期间未受伤高水平竞技撑竿跳高运动员肌肉骨骼系统的主观功能评分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

STUDY AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of commonly used subjective, clinical scores to describe the health status of high-level competitive athletes in different phases of one training year. METHOD: 32 high-level pole vaulters (17 males and 15 females) were followed with support of Deutscher Leichtathletik Verband period of a whole competition year. We used the Tegner activity scale (TAS), the Lysholm score and WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteo-arthritis Index) during recreational, training and competition periods. The score results for the athletes in the recreational phase were compared to the results of a control group. Also, the score results for the athletes in the different periods of the training year were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The statistical comparison of the score values of the control group with those of the athletes in the recreational phase showed no significant differences. Therefore, high-level athletes in pole vault have no subjective physical limitations compared to a control group. In the competition period, the athletes rated themselves lower in the TAS and in the WOMAC index than in the recreational and training phase. The Lysholm score did not show any significant change of subjective physical status in the competition period compared to recreation and training. CONCLUSION: The subjective clinical scores used in this study do not show any changes in the health status of high-level competitive athletes in the course of one training year. If subjective scores are to be used to monitor the health status of high-level athletes, the Tegner scale, as well as the Lysholm and WOMAC scores are most likely not sensitive enough to measure possible over-use or repetitive stress problems.
机译：研究目的：本研究的目的是评估使用常用的主观临床评分来描述高水平竞技运动员在一个训练年的不同阶段的健康状况。方法：在整个比赛年度的Deutscher Leichtathletik Verband时期的支持下，追踪了32名高级别撑杆跳高运动员（男17名，女15名）。在娱乐，训练和比赛期间，我们使用了Tegner活动量表（TAS），Lysholm评分和WOMAC（西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数）。将娱乐阶段运动员的得分结果与对照组的结果进行比较。另外，对训练年不同时期的运动员得分结果进行统计评估。结果：对照组和娱乐期运动员的得分值的统计比较显示无显着差异。因此，与对照组相比，撑竿跳高的高水平运动员没有主观身体上的限制。在比赛期间，运动员在TAS和WOMAC指数中的得分比在娱乐和训练阶段的得分低。与娱乐和训练相比，比赛期间Lysholm评分的主观身体状况没有明显变化。结论：本研究中使用的主观临床评分在一年的训练过程中并未显示高水平竞技运动员的健康状况发生任何变化。如果将主观评分用于监测高水平运动员的健康状况，则Tegner量表以及Lysholm和WOMAC评分很可能不够敏感，无法衡量可能的过度使用或重复性压力问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号