• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sportverletzung Sportschaden: Organ der Gesellschaft fu?r Orthopa?disch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin >Validity of a Complex Soccer-Specific Field Test and a Non-Specific Sprint Test-Assessments for Test and Match Performance [Validierung eines komplexen fu?ballspezifischen und fu?ballunspezifischen Tests-Leistungsdiagnostik im Spannungsfeld von Test- und Wettkampfleistung]
【24h】

Validity of a Complex Soccer-Specific Field Test and a Non-Specific Sprint Test-Assessments for Test and Match Performance [Validierung eines komplexen fu?ballspezifischen und fu?ballunspezifischen Tests-Leistungsdiagnostik im Spannungsfeld von Test- und Wettkampfleistung]

机译：复杂的足球特定场测试和非特定冲刺测试评估对测试和比赛表现的有效性[在测试与比赛表现之间的紧张领域，对复杂的足球特定和非足球特定测试表现诊断的验证]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Soccer assessments often lack specificity and complexity. Examinations of validity for soccer assessments, based on the relation between test and match performance, are available although they are scarce. A complex soccer-specific field test which is validated cannot be found in the literature at all. Objective: The aim of this follow-up study was to assess the validity of a soccer-specific complexity test (FBKT) and a repeated non-specific sprint test (ST) based on three gold standards: match performance, coach ranking, and league affiliation. Materials and Methods: A German fourth league soccer team (n = 14) was assessed using FBKT and ST in the pre-season for the second half of the 2010/2011 season. Afterwards, their performance in 17 matches was evaluated using video analysis in order to compare them with the test parameters (e. g., pass/assist ratio, goals, duelling behaviour). Eighteen months later, the league affiliation of all players was identified and the coach evaluated the tested players. Results: With regard to match performance, playing time was proved to be the most suitable parameter for validating the test performance (FBKT, ST). The total and minimum times of ST were the most powerful parameters in relation to playing time and explained 50 % and 46 % of the variance, respectively. Concerning the FBKT, the parameters "sum of all linear sprintso" (24 %) and "total time of all activity series with penalty time in round twoo" (22 %) explained the highest amount of variance. Coach ranking generated significant odds ratios for the minimum time of ST (OR = 6.5; CI: 3.2 - 5.2 × 1015; p = 0.037), and total time of speed dribbling of the FBKT (OR = 1.3; CI: 1.2 - 199.5; p = 0.036) based on a proportional-odds model. With regard to league affiliation, significant odds ratios occurred with the following parameters: minimum time of ST (OR = 15.8; CI: 2.16 - 115.4; p = 0.007); total time of ST (OR = 3.28; CI: 1.31 - 8.21; p = 0.011); and, total time of speed dribbling for the FBKT (OR = 1.3; CI: 1.01 - 1.61; p = 0.044). Conclusions: This study showed that the larger logical validity of soccer-specific complex tests does not necessarily translate to a larger construct validity, as compared to non-specific tests. However, their value is not limited to performance evaluation. The FBKT provides valuable information concerning training process control. It is possible that its low validity is caused by the poor performance of the players in soccer-specific consequences of actions (centres, goals) due to the restricted differentiation of players.
机译：背景：足球评估通常缺乏特异性和复杂性。尽管测试和比赛成绩之间的关系不多，但可以进行足球评估的有效性检查。在文献中根本找不到经过验证的复杂的足球专用现场测试。目的：这项后续研究的目的是基于三个黄金标准：比赛表现，教练排名和联赛，评估针对足球的复杂性测试（FBKT）和重复的非针对特定的冲刺测试（ST）的有效性。联系。材料和方法：在2010/2011赛季下半年的季前赛中，使用FBKT和ST对一支德国第四联赛足球队（n = 14）进行了评估。之后，使用视频分析评估他们在17场比赛中的表现，以便将它们与测试参数（例如，通过/辅助率，进球，决斗行为）进行比较。 18个月后，确定了所有球员的联盟关系，教练评估了接受测试的球员。结果：关于比赛成绩，比赛时间被证明是验证测试成绩（FBKT，ST）的最合适参数。 ST的总时间和最短时间是与播放时间相关的最强大的参数，分别解释了差异的50％和46％。关于FBKT，参数“所有线性sprintso的总和”（24％）和“所有活动系列的总时间以及第2轮的惩罚时间”（22％）说明了最大的方差。教练排名为ST的最短时间（OR = 6.5; CI：3.2-5.2×1015; p = 0.037）和FBKT运球的总时间产生了明显的优势比（OR = 1.3; CI：1.2-199.5; p = 0.036）。关于联盟关系，出现以下几项的可能性比较大：ST的最短时间（OR = 15.8; CI：2.16-15.4; p = 0.007）; ST的总时间（OR = 3.28; CI：1.31-8.21; p = 0.011）;以及FBKT运球的总时间（OR = 1.3; CI：1.01-1.61; p = 0.044）。结论：这项研究表明，与非特定测试相比，针对足球的复杂测试的更大逻辑有效性并不一定转化为更大的结构有效性。但是，它们的价值不限于性能评估。 FBKT提供了有关培训过程控制的有价值的信息。它的低效性可能是由于球员的差异化导致球员在针对足球的特定动作结果（中心，进球）中表现不佳所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号