• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Reply to letter to the editor: Re: Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Surg Endosc 25:597-603.
【24h】

Reply to letter to the editor: Re: Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Surg Endosc 25:597-603.

机译：回复编辑的信：回复：机器人辅助的胃空肠吻合术并不能改善腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术Surg Endosc的效果25：597-603。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A comparison between a totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) and a standard LRYGBP was not among the objectives of our study, and neither was our objective to compare handsewn vs. robotic sutured laparoscopic anastomoses. The purpose of our study, as clearly stated in its title [1], was to verify whether the introduction of the Da Vinci system in a bariatric program could improve the results of LRYGBP and therefore the results of robotic LRYGBP have been compared with our standard laparoscopic LRYGBP. The results of this study showed that there was no clinical improvement, but operative time was longer and the cost was higher. In our opinion, this was a clear answer to a precisely defined question. Other studies could, and probably should, be designed to answer to the questions proposed by Addeo and Buchs.
机译：完全机械化的腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术（LRYGBP）与标准的LRYGBP的比较既不是我们研究的目的，也不是比较手工缝合与机器人缝合的腹腔镜吻合术的目的。正如其标题[1]中明确指出的那样，我们的研究目的是验证在减肥计划中引入达芬奇系统是否可以改善LRYGBP的结果，因此将机器人LRYGBP的结果与我们的标准进行了比较。腹腔镜LRYGBP。这项研究的结果表明，尚无临床改善，但手术时间更长，成本更高。我们认为，这是对明确定义的问题的明确答案。可以而且应该设计其他研究来回答Addeo和Buchs提出的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号