首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Surgical treatments for rectal prolapse: how does a perineal approach compare in the laparoscopic era?
【24h】

Surgical treatments for rectal prolapse: how does a perineal approach compare in the laparoscopic era?

机译:直肠脱垂的外科治疗:在腹腔镜时代,会阴方法如何比较?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with rectal prolapse often have significant comorbidities that lead surgeons to select a perineal resection for treatment despite a reported higher recurrence rate over abdominal approaches. There is a lack of data to support this practice in the laparoscopic era. The objective of this study was to evaluate if risk-adjusted morbidity of perineal surgery for rectal prolapse is actually lower than laparoscopic surgery.
机译:直肠脱垂患者通常有明显的合并症,尽管据报道复发率高于腹部入路,但仍导致外科医生选择会阴切除术进行治疗。在腹腔镜时代缺乏支持这种做法的数据。这项研究的目的是评估会阴手术对直肠脱垂的风险调整后的发病率是否实际上低于腹腔镜手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号