...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Supply Chain Management >Linking collaboration and integration to risk and performance in supply chains via a review of literature reviews
【24h】

Linking collaboration and integration to risk and performance in supply chains via a review of literature reviews

机译：通过文献综述，将协作和集成与供应链中的风险和绩效联系起来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to assess the links among these supply chain constructs by conducting a full-scale systematic review of all supply chain management (SCM) literature reviews published in ten leading logistics, SCM and operations management journals from 1989 to 2012. Collaboration and integration are as central to SCM as risk and performance management. Design/methodology/approach - The authors apply content analysis to execute the systematic literature review on the sample of 103 articles, supplemented by contingency analysis. These approaches guarantee a replicable, rigorous and transparent research process and minimize researcher bias. The analytical categories required for the content analysis are defined along the constructs of collaboration/integration and risk/performance. Findings - As can be expected, the review highlights the key role of the two constructs in SCM. In this light, the research claims to provide statistical evidence of a link between the constructs of collaboration/integration and risk/performance, most notably between collaboration and performance, information sharing and rewards sharing, as well as integration and supply chain performance. Research limitations/implications - The study assesses the link between the constructs of collaboration/integration and risk/performance through research embedded in literature reviews, pinpointing research gaps and potential future research directions in the field. Contributing to SCM theory building, a thorough review provides statistical proof of the link between collaboration/integration and risk/performance. Originality/value - Although numerous literature reviews have been conducted in the past on the SCM constructs of collaboration/integration and risk/performance, no full review of literature reviews aiming to test a theoretical link in the here presented form has yet been undertaken to the authors' knowledge.
机译：目的-本文旨在通过对1989年至2012年在十种领先的物流，SCM和运营管理期刊上发表的所有供应链管理（SCM）文献综述进行全面的系统评价，来评估这些供应链结构之间的联系。集成对于SCM至关重要，就像风险和绩效管理一样。设计/方法/方法-作者运用内容分析对103篇文章的样本进行系统的文献综述，并辅以偶然性分析。这些方法保证了可重复，严格和透明的研究过程，并使研究人员的偏见最小化。内容分析所需的分析类别是根据协作/集成和风险/绩效的结构定义的。发现-可以预见，该评论突出了这两种结构在SCM中的关键作用。有鉴于此，该研究声称将提供统计证据，证明协作/整合与风险/绩效之间的联系，尤其是协作与绩效，信息共享与奖励共享以及整合与供应链绩效之间的联系。研究的局限性/含义-该研究通过嵌入文献综述的研究评估协作/整合结构与风险/绩效之间的联系，指出该领域的研究差距和潜在的未来研究方向。对SCM理论的建立做出了贡献，进行了全面的审查，为协作/集成与风险/绩效之间的联系提供了统计证明。原创性/价值-尽管过去曾对协作/整合和风险/绩效的SCM结构进行过许多文献综述，但尚未进行旨在检验本文介绍形式的理论联系的文献综述的完整综述。作者的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号