...
首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurement during VVI and DDD pacing: relationship to symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing.
【24h】

Noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurement during VVI and DDD pacing: relationship to symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing.

机译:在VVI和DDD起搏期间进行无创搏动式血压测量:与DDD起搏的症状获益之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To noninvasively assess the hemodynamic effects of VVI and DDD pacing modes we measured beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure during VVI and DDD pacing in 30 patients with complete heart block (CHB), using fingertip photoplethysmography. Of these patients, 15 undertook a double-blind cross-over comparison of the symptomatic effects of VVI versus DDD pacing to determine the relationship between blood pressure changes and the occurrence of symptoms suggestive of the pacemaker syndrome during ventricular pacing. Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure was 11.7 (15.4) mmHg lower during VVI pacing compared to DDD pacing (P < 0.0005). The mean (SD) beat-to-beat variability of systolic blood pressure was 5.20 (2.87%) in VVI mode versus 2.12 (1.07%) in DDD mode (P < 0.0000005). In comparison with DDD pacing, the excess of symptoms experienced by patients during VVI pacing did not correlate with the change in mean systolic blood pressure, but was significantly correlated with the increase in beat-to-beat systolic blood pressure variation during VVI pacing (r = 0.58, P = 0.024). We conclude that noninvasive measurement of fingertip arterial beat-to-beat blood pressure is a rapid and simple method of assessing the hemodynamic effect of VVI pacing. Beat-to-beat blood pressure variability was related to symptomatic intolerance of VVI pacing and may have potential utility as an aid to diagnosis or as a predictor of pacemaker syndrome.
机译:为了无创地评估VVI和DDD起搏模式的血液动力学影响,我们使用指尖光体积描记法测量了30例完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)患者在VVI和DDD起搏过程中的逐搏血压。在这些患者中,有15位对VVI和DDD起搏的症状效果进行了双盲交叉比较,以确定血压变化与心律起搏期间提示起搏器综合征的症状之间的关系。与DDD起搏相比,VVI起搏期间的平均(SD)收缩压降低了11.7(15.4)mmHg(P <0.0005)。在VVI模式下,收缩压的平均心跳变异性为5.20(2.87%),而在DDD模式下为2.12(1.07%)(P <0.0000005)。与DDD起搏相比,患者在VVI起搏期间出现的症状过多与平均收缩压的变化无关,但与在VVI起搏期间逐搏的收缩压变化的增加显着相关(r = 0.58,P = 0.024)。我们得出的结论是指尖动脉搏动血压的无创测量是评估VVI起搏的血流动力学效应的一种快速而简单的方法。节律性血压波动与VVI起搏的症状不耐受性有关,可能具有潜在的实用性,可帮助诊断或预测起搏器综合症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号