...
首页> 外文期刊>Parasitology >Commentary on 'A Candide response to Panglossian accusations by Randolph and Dobson: biodiversity buffers disease' by Dr R. Ostfeld {Parasitology 2013, in press)
【24h】

Commentary on 'A Candide response to Panglossian accusations by Randolph and Dobson: biodiversity buffers disease' by Dr R. Ostfeld {Parasitology 2013, in press)

机译:R. Ostfeld博士对“ Randolph和Dobson对庞格洛斯指控的坦率回应:生物多样性缓冲疾病”的评论(寄生虫学,2013年,印刷中)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We are disappointed with Ostfeld's parochial commentary (Ostfeld, 2013) because we hoped we had addressed the dilution theory debate from a wider perspective, taking into account studies beyond those originating in New York State (Randolph & Dobson, 2012). We emphasized the inherent variability in the effects of biodiversity on the risk of zoonotic disease, noting explicitly that Ostfeld's own work allowed for positive, neutral and negative outcomes depending on the precise circumstances and biological interactions. The wider the range of studies, the greater the evidence for neutral and positive outcomes (i.e. biodiversity may have no effect or exacerbate infection risk) as the literature bias is gradually overcome. Publication bias, however, may still persist and be identified by appropriate meta-analyses (Salkeld etal, 2013).
机译:我们对Ostfeld狭par的评论感到失望(Ostfeld,2013),因为我们希望我们能从更广泛的角度来解决稀释理论的争论,并考虑到源于纽约州的研究以外的研究(Randolph&Dobson,2012)。我们强调了生物多样性对人畜共患疾病风险的影响所固有的可变性,并明确指出奥斯特菲尔德自己的工作根据确切的环境和生物相互作用得出积极,中性和消极的结果。研究范围越广,随着文献偏见逐渐被克服,中立和积极结果(即生物多样性可能没有影响或加剧感染风险)的证据就越大。但是,出版偏倚可能仍然存在,并且可以通过适当的荟萃分析加以识别(Salkeld等,2013)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号