Everything you wanted to know about reviewing journal articles but were afraid to ask

Biomaterials Forum Group

首页> 外文期刊>Biomaterials Forum >Everything you wanted to know about reviewing journal articles but were afraid to ask

【24h】

Everything you wanted to know about reviewing journal articles but were afraid to ask

机译：您想了解的有关审阅期刊文章的所有信息，但又害怕问

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Peer review of journal articles has been described as the linchpin of science/engineering because it is the process by which research becomes knowledge(CSE 25(6):187,2002).While the usefulness of the peer-review process is evident as a process separating poor studies from rigorous,well-planned studies for publication/dissemination,the actual process and responsibilities of reviewers are rarely detailed;the assumption being it is something professionals 'just do.'

机译：期刊论文的同行评审被描述为科学/工程学的关键，因为它是研究成为知识的过程（CSE 25（6）：187,2002）。将不良研究与严格，计划周密的研究进行发布/分发的过程分开，审核者的实际过程和职责很少详细描述;假设这是专业人员“正当做的”事情。

著录项

来源
《Biomaterials Forum》 |2009年第1期|共1页
作者
Biomaterials Forum Group;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类生物科学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Everything you wanted to know about reviewing journal articles but were afraid to ask [J] . Biomaterials Forum Group Biomaterials Forum . 2009,第1期

机译：您想了解的有关审阅期刊文章的所有信息，但又害怕问
2. Letter by Sipido and Glanzel Regarding Article, "Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Cardiovascular Journals from 1997 to 2007: Analysis of 5-Year Citation Rates" [J] . Sipido Karin R., Glanzel Wolfgang Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association . 2016,第2期

机译：Sipido和Glanzel关于文章的信，1997年至2007年的同伴审查的心血管期刊中的文章很差：5年引用率分析“
3. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. [J] . Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association . 1998,第3期

机译：系统评价和荟萃分析的方法和报告：Cochrane评价与纸质期刊上发表的文章的比较。
4. Application of Peer Reviewed Journal Articles for Enhancing Technological Literacy [C] . Robert M. Brooks, Mehmet Cetin, Jyothsna Kavuturu American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition . 2014

机译：同行综述期刊文章的应用加强技术素养
5. Enhancing the Understanding of Integration in Mixed Methods Research by Reviewing Integration Strategies in Published Journal Articles: A Systematic Review [D] . Zhou, Yi. 2020

机译：通过审查公布期刊文章中的整合策略，提高对混合方法研究的整合的理解：系统审查
6. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary [O] . Elvis Enowbeyang Tarkang, Luchuo Engelbert Bain 2019

机译：非洲研究人员在国际期刊上发表研究文章的祸根同行评审过程和掠夺性期刊的有争议问题：评论
7. The Framingham Offspring Study: a commentary1150th AnniversaryHistorical ArticleINTRODUCTIONIn this edition of the Journal, we release the fifth in a series of reviews of influential articles that have been previously published in ACC journals, including the American Journal of Cardiology(from 1958 to 1982) and JACC(from 1983 to the present). The publication of these articles is only one aspect of the ACC’s 50th anniversary commemoration, which highlights 50 years of leadership in cardiovascular care and education. The articles are intended to encourage reflection on the remarkable progress made in cardiovascular medicine over time, as well as to acknowledge the amazing prescience of some early investigators in anticipating and, in many cases, later guiding developments in their field.The working group responsible for selecting these articles and asking reviewers to write editorials solicited suggestions from the ACC’s clinical committees and individual members.The group achieved consensus fairly easily, including whom the group should ask to prepare the accompanying editorials. We initially drew up a list of 14 general areas to cover in this series, but later found that there are several major areas of modern cardiology, prominently molecular cardiology, in which the truly landmark articles have, alas, not yet been published in JACC. Therefore, the working group decided not to categorize by subject, but instead, to concentrate on the most important articles.The working group, a task force of the Subcommittee for the Commemoration of the ACC 50th Anniversary, owes a great deal to Ms. May A. Roustom and the efficient and tireless staff at Heart House for facilitating this project. We also wish to thank all who suggested articles and, most important, the authors who prepared reviews for their willingness to contribute their time and wisdom.Influential Articles in JACC Working GroupSharon A. Hunt, M.D., F.A.C.C.Rick A. Nishimura, M.D., F.A.C.C.H.J.C. Swan, M.D., Ph.D., M.A.C.C.Michael J. Wolk, M.D., F.A.C.C. [O] . Swan H.J.C 1999

机译：弗雷明汉后代研究：1150周年历史文章引言在本期杂志中，我们发布了一系列有影响力的文章的第五篇评论，这些评论先前已在ACC期刊上发表，包括《美国心脏病学杂志》（1958年至1982年）和《美国心脏病学会杂志》（从1983年至今）。这些文章的发表只是ACC成立50周年纪念的一个方面，该纪念日着重介绍了心血管护理和教育领域50年的领导地位。这些文章旨在鼓励人们对心血管医学随着时间的推移所取得的显着进展进行反思，并承认一些早期研究人员在预见并在许多情况下为他们领域的发展提供指导的惊人先见之明。选择这些文章并要求审稿人撰写社论，征求ACC临床委员会和个人成员的建议。该小组相当容易达成共识，包括该小组应要求谁准备随附的社论。我们最初拟出了本系列文章涵盖的14个常规领域的清单，但后来发现现代心脏病学有几个主要领域，主要是分子心脏病学，可惜的是，真正的具有里程碑意义的文章尚未在JACC上发表。因此，工作组决定不按主题进行分类，而是专注于最重要的文章。工作组是ACC成立50周年纪念小组委员会的一个工作组，在很大程度上要归功于梅女士。 A. Roustom和Heart House高效而孜孜不倦的员工为该项目提供了便利。我们还要感谢所有提出建议的文章，最重要的是感谢准备撰写评论以贡献自己的时间和智慧的作者.JACC工作组的有影响力的文章Sharon A. Swan，M.D.，Ph.D.，M.A.C.C. Michael J.Wolk，M.D.，F.A.C.C.

Everything you wanted to know about reviewing journal articles but were afraid to ask

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅