...
首页> 外文期刊>Biomaterials Forum >Ethics and Implant Pathology/How can courts trying biomaterial cases be made to serve justice with valid and relevant science?
【24h】

Ethics and Implant Pathology/How can courts trying biomaterial cases be made to serve justice with valid and relevant science?

机译:伦理学和植入物病理学/如何通过有效和相关的科学手段使审理生物材料案件的法院伸张正义?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Science deals with data,jurisprudence with evidence.The goal of science is to understand the natural world.The goal of jurisprudence is justice.It may appear evidence and data are synonymous,after all evidence is just data relevant to the case being adjudicated.But the devil for science in the courtroom is the determination of relevancy.For a judge,the relevancy of data is the degree to which they are consistent with justice.
机译:科学处理数据,法学处理证据。科学的目的是理解自然界。法学的目标是正义。它可能会显示证据和数据是同义词,毕竟所有证据只是与被裁定案件有关的数据。在法庭上,科学的魔鬼是相关性的决定。对于法官而言,数据的相关性是数据与正义相符的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号