...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Bruesewitz v Wyeth: ensuring the availability of children's vaccines.
【24h】

Bruesewitz v Wyeth: ensuring the availability of children's vaccines.

机译：Bruesewitz诉Wyeth：确保提供儿童疫苗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

On February 22, 2011, in the case of Bruesewitz v Wyeth} the US Supreme Court preserved the crucial role of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in ensuring the continuing availability of children's vaccines in the United States. Although at first glance the Bruesewitz case may seem to be simply a technical decision that addressed the legal intricacies of products liability law, the case has important implications for pediatricians, their patients, and the continuity of our vaccine supply.By the 1980s, vaccines had become so successful at preventing many infectious diseases that the public was becoming much less alarmed by those diseases2 and much more concerned with the risk of injury from the vaccines themselves.
机译：2011年2月22日，在Bruesewitz诉Wyeth案中，美国最高法院保留了《国家儿童疫苗伤害法案》（NCVIA）在确保美国儿童疫苗继续可用方面的关键作用。尽管乍看之下Bruesewitz案似乎只是解决产品责任法法律复杂性的技术决定，但此案对儿科医生，他们的患者以及我们疫苗供应的连续性具有重要意义。到1980年代，疫苗已经在预防许多传染病方面如此成功，以至于公众对这些疾病的警惕性降低了2，而更多地关注了疫苗本身造成伤害的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号