...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric dentistry >Use of coolant for high-speed tooth preparation: A survey of pediatric dentist members of the American Academy Of Pediatric Dentistry
【24h】

Use of coolant for high-speed tooth preparation: A survey of pediatric dentist members of the American Academy Of Pediatric Dentistry

机译:冷却剂在高速牙齿准备中的使用:美国儿科牙科学院儿科牙医调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To report the findings of a survey to determine the educational experiences, opinions and clinical practices relative to the use of coolant during cavity preparation of pediatric dentist members of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) and to determine whether teaching policies influenced the type of coolant used in private practice. Methods: Four thousand fifty surveys were emailed to AAPD members and included questions regarding demographics and predoctoral, graduate, and current practice policies for the use of dry cutting. Results: Returned survey numbered 1730 for a response rate of 43%. Fifteen percent were taught the concept of dry cutting in their predoctoral programs and 34% in their specialty, programs. Sixty percent never or rarely prepare teeth without water coolant. Slightly more than 40% prepared teeth with air coolant alone. Patient behavior (25%) and sedation (21%) were reported as determining factors for cutting dry. Thirty-one percent of private practice clinicians and 34% of part time academics use dry cutting, while only 15% of full time academicians use the technique (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Respondents tend to use the technique they were taught during their residency. Use of dry cutting was more likely to be utilized during sedations or general anesthesia to avoid airway compromise.
机译:目的:报告一项调查的结果,以确定与美国儿科牙医学会(AAPD)儿科牙医准备牙腔时使用冷却剂有关的教育经验,意见和临床实践,并确定教学政策是否影响了私人使用的冷却液类型。方法:将450份调查问卷通过电子邮件发送给AAPD成员,其中包括有关人口统计和博士后,研究生以及当前使用干切法的实践政策的问题。结果:返回的调查编号为1730,答复率为43%。在他们的博士前课程中,有15%的人接受了干法切割的概念,在他们的专业课程中,有34%的人接受了干法切割的概念。 60%的人从来没有或很少准备没有冷却水的牙齿。仅使用空气冷却剂的牙齿就略有40%以上。据报道,患者行为(25%)和镇静(21%)是导致干dry的决定性因素。 31%的私人执业临床医生和34%的兼职学者使用干切法,而只有15%的专职学者使用该技术(P <0.0001)。结论:受访者倾向于在居住期间使用所教的技术。在镇静或全身麻醉期间更可能使用干切,以避免气道受损。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号