...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Physics essays >Contradiction divides two aether theories—An exploration into the three parts of the speed-of-light postulate
【24h】

Contradiction divides two aether theories—An exploration into the three parts of the speed-of-light postulate

机译：矛盾划分了两种以太理论—对光速假设的三个部分的探讨

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Two aether theories are briefly described and then compared on the basis of how they handle relative motion. It is shown that the "modern Maxwell–Lorentz aether theory" leads to a contradiction; while the Dynamic Steady State Universe (a model based on the premise that all things are processes) aether theory maintains logical integrity and maintains agreement with Einstein's special relativity. There is a discussion that examines the apparent conflict between Einstein's postulated constancy of the speed of light for all uniformly moving observers on the one hand, and, on the other, the evidence that the speed of light pulses actually varies with the motion of the observer. The final section brings together three essential components that make up an extended postulate for the speed of light. The extended postulate, in turn, becomes the important part of a realistic aether theory.
机译：简要介绍了两种以太理论，然后根据它们如何处理相对运动进行比较。结果表明，“现代麦克斯韦-洛伦兹以太理论”导致了矛盾。而动态稳态世界（一个以万物为过程为前提的模型）以太理论保持逻辑完整性，并与爱因斯坦的相对论保持一致。进行了一次讨论，该讨论一方面考察了爱因斯坦对所有匀速运动的观察者的假定光速恒定性，另一方面又证明了光脉冲的速度实际上随观察者的运动而变化的证据。 。最后一部分汇集了三个基本组成部分，它们构成了光速的扩展假设。反过来，扩展的假设成为现实的以太理论的重要组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号